Re: Puppet proposal

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <kwade(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: infra(a)ovirt.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 5:24:09 PM > Subject: Re: Puppet proposal > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/14/2012 03:25 AM, Eyal Edri wrote: >> i have a deamon i've written already - attached. > Do we have a git repo for the Infra team yet? I know we could have > Puppet manifests in its own repo, but we have other version control > needs. Maybe one repo? i recommend one repo for puppet classes. ('puppet') we can publish it to community also, so people can contribute puppet classes we well. i still think we need a separate 'jenkins' repo for all jenkins code, for personal exp using complex jenkins code in jobs. but i won't object to have a single repo for starts with subdirectories (/jenkins /puppet /foreman)

E. > - - Karsten > - -- > Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth > http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com > @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 > _______________________________________________ > Infra mailing list > Infra(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra