This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2LOQSSJQNCEJVRLQHWEUO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/13/2013 10:51 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
=20 Where is the optimal place to get project approval on new lists? board@=
could be it, but arch@ seems like really the best one. Or should we jus= t let people file a ticket and we only ask them to go get approval if it'= s unclear to us if it's an obvious yes?
I completely forgot that the oVirt Marketing group (and by extension, its mailing list) were approved by the Board at the oVirt workshop at NetApp last January. (Asking people to mention approvals and stuff would be a good part to add to a simple how-to-get-a-list process.) I'm going ahead and creating this list immediately, as per the previously mentioned process. - Karsten --=20 Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 ------enig2LOQSSJQNCEJVRLQHWEUO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iD8DBQFRQmOq2ZIOBq0ODEERAoS1AJ9eknT5J6NiWS1M6hXsLXhAOA/fEwCg26l/ Y5v7AQId8F+vX5VFfs23y7c= =rqeL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2LOQSSJQNCEJVRLQHWEUO--