On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Eli Mesika <emesika(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Ha , one more thing :
We would like to force the existence of such hooks if possible ...
+1
The hook should be included by default after git clone if possible. And if
it's then I'd also force inclusion of commit message hook which generates
change-id
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Eli Mesika
<emesika(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I have talked with Eyal about the $Subject and he asked me to write and
> send this email
>
> As you probably know, we have from time to time an issue with duplicate
> upgrade scripts that are merged by mistake, each such issue forces us to
> publish a fixing patch that renames the duplicated file.
> I was discussed this issue today with Marin P on out weekly meeting
>
> We would like to write some kind of a hook that will check on each patch
> set if it has DB upgrade files and rename them (if necessary) such that it
> will have the correct numbering according to the last existing upgrade
> patch on the related branch.
>
> The hook should be done upon 'git push' request so it will also prevent
> CI tests to fail on this issue
>
> I will be happy to get your ideas/comments on that
>
> Thanks
>
> Eli Mesika
>