This needs to be maintained by someone. Probably fit into gerrit as docs project.

++++++1 on the docs which are missing and newby's cannot understand what they're up against. -- /d "Air conditioned environment - Do NOT open Windows!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/15/2011 09:07 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: >> This needs to be maintained by someone. Probably fit into gerrit >> as docs project. > > I assume that the standard policy of 'he who thought of it does > it' applies...at least initially. I just need the repository > created so I can being importing some content as appropriate. Itamar - can you bounce to me the documentation you have for gerrit.ovirt.org setup? I'd like to clean it up for the Infrastructure wiki.

As it stands, I think Itamar is the only one with the knowledge on how to setup new repos in the current setup ... but I really don't know. :) - - Karsten - -- name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Architect team: Red Hat Community Architecture& Leadership uri: http://communityleadershipteam.org http://TheOpenSourceWay.org gpg: AD0E0C41 _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <kwade(a)redhat.com&gt; To: infra(a)ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:01:54 PM Subject: Re: Request for documentation GIT repository. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/15/2011 08:38 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to request creation of an ovirt-docs GIT repository > for any and all documentation activity which is to occur outside of > the wiki, particularly in formats that might initially be imported > from other sources (DocBook XML). Makes good sense. Only thing I suggest is to make the repository simply 'docs'.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/15/2011 09:09 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: > > I asked for ovirt-docs as we appear to have consistently attached > 'ovirt-' as the prefix for the names of all the other > repositories. Was there any particular reason for this? I suspect it is leftover from fedorahosted.org. I didn't create the instances nor notice the naming, I presumed the ovirt- prefix would be dropped when we had our own stand-alone git. *shrug* I recommend we do just that from now on; no idea if we should 'fix' the existing repos or not.

>> On 11/15/2011 08:38 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to request creation of an ovirt-docs GIT repository >>> for any and all documentation activity which is to occur outside >>> of >>> the wiki, particularly in formats that might initially be >>> imported >>> from other sources (DocBook XML). >> >> Makes good sense. Only thing I suggest is to make the repository >> simply 'docs'. > > I asked for ovirt-docs as we appear to have consistently attached > 'ovirt-' as the prefix for the names of all the other > repositories. Was there any particular reason for this? I agree. convention for all other repos so far (other than vdsm) is ovirt-* so ovirt-docs sounds better to me it also means anyone doing a simple 'git clone' will get it in a folder called ovirt-docs rather than just docs. unless there are any objections, i'll create an ovirt-docs git repo in gerrit.

Steve - please register to gerrit so i can add you as a maintainer for it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/15/2011 11:29 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: > I agree. convention for all other repos so far (other than vdsm) is > ovirt-* so ovirt-docs sounds better to me it also means anyone > doing a simple 'git clone' will get it in a folder called > ovirt-docs rather than just docs. > > unless there are any objections, i'll create an ovirt-docs git repo > in gerrit. Steve - please register to gerrit so i can add you as a > maintainer for it. Not sure if my ACK made it through already, but +1 to this as you've explained it, makes sense.