7:20 a.m.
Hello,
I am going to install something similar to [1]. I have a ticket for it here [2]
The question on which server do we want to deploy it ?
[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/ticket/49
- Kiril
8:25 a.m.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:20:03AM -0400, Kiril Nesenko wrote:
I am going to install something similar to [1]. I have a ticket for
it
here [2] The question on which server do we want to deploy it ?
I'd say linode01.ovirt.org for now since that's already our webserver. I
think when we start to split linode01, we can move it together with the
repos to resources.ovirt.org.
8:34 a.m.
On 05/22/2013 09:25 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:20:03AM -0400, Kiril Nesenko wrote:
> I am going to install something similar to [1]. I have a ticket for it
> here [2] The question on which server do we want to deploy it ?
I'd say linode01.ovirt.org for now since that's already our webserver. I
think when we start to split linode01, we can move it together with the
repos to resources.ovirt.org.
Don't we already have the ability to run vms on the alterway servers?
I'd say we shouldn't add anything new linode, if we can avoid it.
Mike
> [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/
> [2] https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/ticket/49
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
8:40 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Burns" <mburns(a)redhat.com>
To: infra(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:34:46 PM
Subject: Re: ovirt.apps service
On 05/22/2013 09:25 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:20:03AM -0400, Kiril Nesenko wrote:
>> I am going to install something similar to [1]. I have a ticket for it
>> here [2] The question on which server do we want to deploy it ?
>
> I'd say linode01.ovirt.org for now since that's already our webserver. I
> think when we start to split linode01, we can move it together with the
> repos to resources.ovirt.org.
Don't we already have the ability to run vms on the alterway servers?
I'd say we shouldn't add anything new linode, if we can avoid it.
+1, completely agree, let's start moving stuff to it.
Mike
>
>> [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/
>> [2] https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/ticket/49
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
2:13 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
------enig2DTVEAHUQMJFNGBDROCHL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 05/22/2013 06:34 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 05/22/2013 09:25 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:20:03AM -0400, Kiril Nesenko wrote:
>> I am going to install something similar to [1]. I have a ticket for i=
t
>> here [2] The question on which server do we want to deploy it
?
>
> I'd say linode01.ovirt.org for now since that's already our webserver.=
I
> think when we start to split linode01, we can move it together
with th=
e
> repos to resources.ovirt.org.
=20
Don't we already have the ability to run vms on the alterway servers?
I'd say we shouldn't add anything new linode, if we can avoid it.
+1 to not adding anything to the Linode, we want off that service. I'd
only want to do something as an emergency.
- Karsten
Mike
>
>> [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/
>> [2] https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/ticket/49
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
=20
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
--=20
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
------enig2DTVEAHUQMJFNGBDROCHL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iD8DBQFRnRjj2ZIOBq0ODEERAv2JAJ9ZdJm0nmzP5L3tXO34GTAFbkwsFwCglIQI
zCLrfXqMMoILEXnnGezGZ8o=
=u2OC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------enig2DTVEAHUQMJFNGBDROCHL--
3989
days inactive
3989
days old
4 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden -
Eyal Edri -
Karsten 'quaid' Wade -
Kiril Nesenko -
Mike Burns