As part of the move to a more universal oVirt Node during the 3.3 time frame[1], a separate repo is needed for a plugin to allow oVirt Node to communicate with oVirt Engine [2]. In order to provide this plugin, I need a gerrit repo created and also need consensus on a name. Name proposal: ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm

I'm rather indifferent to what we call this, so I figured I'd include the arch@ list to get feedback. Thanks Mike [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_vdsm_plugin _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list Arch(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:02:34AM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: > On 05/17/2013 07:31 AM, Mike Burns wrote: >> As part of the move to a more universal oVirt Node during the 3.3 time >> frame[1], a separate repo is needed for a plugin to allow oVirt Node to >> communicate with oVirt Engine [2]. >> >> In order to provide this plugin, I need a gerrit repo created and also >> need consensus on a name. >> >> Name proposal: >> ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm > I would go with that one. me2, though I do not have a strong opinion or explanation.

> >> I'm rather indifferent to what we call this, so I figured I'd include >> the arch@ list to get feedback. >> >> Thanks >> >> Mike >> >> [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image >> [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_vdsm_plugin _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

On 05/20/2013 04:11 PM, Mike Burns wrote: > On 05/19/2013 08:21 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:02:34AM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf >> wrote: >>> On 05/17/2013 07:31 AM, Mike Burns wrote: >>>> As part of the move to a more universal oVirt Node during the 3.3 time >>>> frame[1], a separate repo is needed for a plugin to allow oVirt >>>> Node to >>>> communicate with oVirt Engine [2]. >>>> >>>> In order to provide this plugin, I need a gerrit repo created and also >>>> need consensus on a name. >>>> >>>> Name proposal: >>>> ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm >>> I would go with that one. >> >> me2, though I do not have a strong opinion or explanation. >> > > ok, let's go with that. I've already posted initial test packages on > ovirt.org[1] with that name, so let's just go with that. repo created. mike - you currently have +2/merge rights.

> > Mike > > [1] > http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/node-base/beta/rpm/Fedora/18/noarch/ > >>> >>>> I'm rather indifferent to what we call this, so I figured I'd include >>>> the arch@ list to get feedback. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image >>>> [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_vdsm_plugin >> _______________________________________________ >> Infra mailing list >> Infra(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra >> > > _______________________________________________ > Arch mailing list > Arch(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra