9:12 a.m.
Hi,
PPC64 support is going to be introduced as new feature in oVirt 3.4.0.
So we should start delivering PPC64 packages for arch dependent packages for both EL6 and
Fedora.
VMs may be small enough since they should only build nightly vdsm and
ovirt-host-deploy-offline: 1 core, 512Mb ram, 10Gb disk
Software needed: minimal install + vdsm and ovirt-host-deploy-offline build deps.
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
12:15 a.m.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
PPC64 support is going to be introduced as new feature in oVirt
3.4.0.
So we should start delivering PPC64 packages for arch dependent packages for both EL6 and
Fedora.
VMs may be small enough since they should only build nightly vdsm and
ovirt-host-deploy-offline: 1 core, 512Mb ram, 10Gb disk
Software needed: minimal install + vdsm and ovirt-host-deploy-offline build deps.
Since we only have x86 hardware which run oVirt. Does it have to be a
PPC64 VM because I don't think we can host that right now.
9:12 a.m.
Il 10/02/2014 23:15, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ha scritto:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> PPC64 support is going to be introduced as new feature in oVirt 3.4.0.
> So we should start delivering PPC64 packages for arch dependent packages for both EL6
and Fedora.
> VMs may be small enough since they should only build nightly vdsm and
ovirt-host-deploy-offline: 1 core, 512Mb ram, 10Gb disk
> Software needed: minimal install + vdsm and ovirt-host-deploy-offline build deps.
Since we only have x86 hardware which run oVirt. Does it have to be a
PPC64 VM because I don't think we can host that right now.
AFAIK we can run qemu-system-ppc64 also on x86_64. Or am I missing something?
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
9:14 a.m.
Il 11/02/2014 08:12, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto:
Il 10/02/2014 23:15, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ha scritto:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> PPC64 support is going to be introduced as new feature in oVirt 3.4.0.
>> So we should start delivering PPC64 packages for arch dependent packages for both
EL6 and Fedora.
>> VMs may be small enough since they should only build nightly vdsm and
ovirt-host-deploy-offline: 1 core, 512Mb ram, 10Gb disk
>> Software needed: minimal install + vdsm and ovirt-host-deploy-offline build
deps.
>
> Since we only have x86 hardware which run oVirt. Does it have to be a
> PPC64 VM because I don't think we can host that right now.
AFAIK we can run qemu-system-ppc64 also on x86_64. Or am I missing something?
Alternative is cross compile for ppc64 from x86_64.
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
2:13 a.m.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:12:45AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 10/02/2014 23:15, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ha scritto:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> PPC64 support is going to be introduced as new feature in oVirt 3.4.0.
>> So we should start delivering PPC64 packages for arch dependent packages for
both EL6 and Fedora.
>> VMs may be small enough since they should only build nightly vdsm and
ovirt-host-deploy-offline: 1 core, 512Mb ram, 10Gb disk
>> Software needed: minimal install + vdsm and ovirt-host-deploy-offline build
deps.
>
> Since we only have x86 hardware which run oVirt. Does it have to be a
> PPC64 VM because I don't think we can host that right now.
AFAIK we can run qemu-system-ppc64 also on x86_64. Or am I missing something?
Can we also do this with oVirt as host? Ideally I'd prefer not having to
manually host a VM but have oVirt take care of it. Could a VDSM hook
possibly solve this if not built in?
10:08 a.m.
------=_Part_1883921_1034057780.1392192482799
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Maybe aline can help here?
as you can see we also need POWER pc slaves, so if you can contribute
a server which we can run ppc vms on, it will be great both for kimchi and oVirt.
Eyal.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden"
<ewoud+ovirt(a)kohlvanwijngaarden.nl>
To: infra(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:13:48 AM
Subject: Re: Request for 3 PPC64 vm slaves for Jenkins
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:12:45AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 10/02/2014 23:15, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> >> PPC64 support is going to be introduced as new feature in oVirt 3.4.0.
> >> So we should start delivering PPC64 packages for arch dependent packages
> >> for both EL6 and Fedora.
> >> VMs may be small enough since they should only build nightly vdsm and
> >> ovirt-host-deploy-offline: 1 core, 512Mb ram, 10Gb disk
> >> Software needed: minimal install + vdsm and ovirt-host-deploy-offline
> >> build deps.
> >
> > Since we only have x86 hardware which run oVirt. Does it have to be a
> > PPC64 VM because I don't think we can host that right now.
>
> AFAIK we can run qemu-system-ppc64 also on x86_64. Or am I missing
> something?
Can we also do this with oVirt as host? Ideally I'd prefer not having to
manually host a VM but have oVirt take care of it. Could a VDSM hook
possibly solve this if not built in?
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
------=_Part_1883921_1034057780.1392192482799
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: attachment
Return-Path: infra-bounces(a)ovirt.org
Received: from zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO
zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.13) by
zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014
07:07:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B074416581C;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:07:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
(int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
by zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9A1165856;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:07:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx15.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.20])
by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
s1AC7lxm024467;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:07:47 -0500
Received: from lists.ovirt.org (lists.ovirt.org [173.255.252.138])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1AC7khH021468;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:07:46 -0500
Received: from lists.ovirt.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by lists.ovirt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2450C1A6;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:07:45 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: infra(a)ovirt.org
Delivered-To: infra(a)ovirt.org
Received: from e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (e24smtp01.br.ibm.com [32.104.18.85])
by lists.ovirt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E43C119
for <infra(a)ovirt.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:07:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from /spool/local
by e24smtp01.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use
Only! Violators will be prosecuted
for <infra(a)ovirt.org> from <alinefm(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:07:40 -0200
Received: from d24dlp02.br.ibm.com (9.18.248.206)
by e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (10.172.0.143) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway:
Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:07:39 -0200
Received: from d24relay03.br.ibm.com (d24relay03.br.ibm.com [9.13.184.25])
by d24dlp02.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F121DC0063
for <infra(a)ovirt.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:07:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from d24av04.br.ibm.com (d24av04.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.97])
by d24relay03.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
s1AC6vDq16318652
for <infra(a)ovirt.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:06:58 -0200
Received: from d24av04.br.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by d24av04.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
s1AC7ZsI011571 for <infra(a)ovirt.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:07:35 -0200
Received: from [9.8.1.1] ([9.8.1.1])
by d24av04.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id
s1AC7YLu011551 for <infra(a)ovirt.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:07:34 -0200
Message-ID: <52F8C106.1090303(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:07:34 -0200
From: Aline Manera <alinefm(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: infra(a)ovirt.org
Subject: About Kimchi
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 14021012-1524-0000-0000-000008CF29E9
X-BeenThere: infra(a)ovirt.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for ovirt.org infrastructure team" <infra.ovirt.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/options/infra>;,
<mailto:infra-request@ovirt.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/>
List-Post: <mailto:infra@ovirt.org>
List-Help: <mailto:infra-request@ovirt.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra>;,
<mailto:infra-request@ovirt.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0463499158=="
Sender: infra-bounces(a)ovirt.org
Errors-To: infra-bounces(a)ovirt.org
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0463499158==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------040003060708000808000500"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040003060708000808000500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi all,
As I promised in last scrum meeting I am sending this note to introduce
Kimchi and myself.
Who is Aline?
I am software engineer at IBM LTC (Linux Technology Center) and also
Kimchi maintainer.
What is Kimchi? (https://github.com/kimchi-project/kimchi)
Kimchi is an HTML5 based management tool for KVM.
It is designed to make it as easy as possible to get started with KVM
and create your first guest.
Kimchi is supported in RHEL, Fedora, openSUSE and Ubuntu and also in all
main browsers: Firefox, Chrome, IE and the mobile ones (Chrome, Safari)
And test Kimchi in all those distributions takes too much time.
Because that we want to use Jenkins.
So we can set up a virtual machine with each distribution, run unit
tests, build, install kimchi and run some tests after it.
It can be done for each patch sent to review and also nightly builds.
I am trying to figure out if it is possible to IBM provide us some slave
servers.
At the moment I don't have any update about that. But if we're lucky,
probably the machines will be POWER (any problem with that?)
I will try to always join the infrastructure scrum meeting so I can help
on that.
Regards,
Aline Manera
--------------040003060708000808000500
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="DejaVu Sans Mono">Hi all,<br>
<br>
As I promised in last scrum meeting I am sending this note to
introduce Kimchi and myself.<br>
<br>
Who is Aline?<br>
I am software engineer at IBM LTC (Linux Technology Center) and
also Kimchi maintainer.<br>
<br>
What is Kimchi? (</font><font face="DejaVu Sans Mono"><a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/kimchi-project/kimchi">https://gith...
</font>Kimchi is an HTML5 based management tool for KVM.<br>
It is designed to make it
as easy as possible to get started with KVM and create your first
guest.<br>
<br>
Kimchi is supported in RHEL, Fedora, openSUSE and Ubuntu and also in
all main browsers: Firefox, Chrome, IE and the mobile ones (Chrome,
Safari)<br>
<br>
And test Kimchi in all those distributions takes too much time.<br>
Because that we want to use Jenkins.<br>
So we can set up a virtual machine with each distribution, run unit
tests, build, install kimchi and run some tests after it.<br>
It can be done for each patch sent to review and also nightly
builds.<br>
<br>
I am trying to figure out if it is possible to IBM provide us some
slave servers.<br>
At the moment I don't have any update about that. But <span
id="result_box" class="short_text"
lang="en"><span class="hps">if</span>
<span class="hps">we're lucky</span></span>,
probably the machines
will be POWER (any problem with that?)<br>
<br>
I will try to always join the infrastructure scrum meeting so I can
help on that.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Aline Manera<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------040003060708000808000500--
--===============0463499158==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
--===============0463499158==--
------=_Part_1883921_1034057780.1392192482799--
1:46 p.m.
On 02/12/2014 06:08 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
Maybe aline can help here?
as you can see we also need POWER pc slaves, so if you can contribute
a server which we can run ppc vms on, it will be great both for kimchi and oVirt.
Hi all,
I am going through the legal stuffs to get POWER machines from IBM
available to ovirt community.
But in this first attempt, I am trying to get POWER vms and not a host
POWER machine.
Sandro, Eyal: Do POWER vms work fine for your proposals? Or you need a
host POWER machine?
Eyal.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden"
<ewoud+ovirt(a)kohlvanwijngaarden.nl>
> To: infra(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:13:48 AM
> Subject: Re: Request for 3 PPC64 vm slaves for Jenkins
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:12:45AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> Il 10/02/2014 23:15, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ha scritto:
>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>>> PPC64 support is going to be introduced as new feature in oVirt 3.4.0.
>>>> So we should start delivering PPC64 packages for arch dependent packages
>>>> for both EL6 and Fedora.
>>>> VMs may be small enough since they should only build nightly vdsm and
>>>> ovirt-host-deploy-offline: 1 core, 512Mb ram, 10Gb disk
>>>> Software needed: minimal install + vdsm and ovirt-host-deploy-offline
>>>> build deps.
>>> Since we only have x86 hardware which run oVirt. Does it have to be a
>>> PPC64 VM because I don't think we can host that right now.
>> AFAIK we can run qemu-system-ppc64 also on x86_64. Or am I missing
>> something?
> Can we also do this with oVirt as host? Ideally I'd prefer not having to
> manually host a VM but have oVirt take care of it. Could a VDSM hook
> possibly solve this if not built in?
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
2:05 p.m.
Il 12/02/2014 12:46, Aline Manera ha scritto:
On 02/12/2014 06:08 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> Maybe aline can help here?
> as you can see we also need POWER pc slaves, so if you can contribute
> a server which we can run ppc vms on, it will be great both for kimchi and oVirt.
Hi all,
I am going through the legal stuffs to get POWER machines from IBM available to ovirt
community.
But in this first attempt, I am trying to get POWER vms and not a host POWER machine.
Sandro, Eyal: Do POWER vms work fine for your proposals? Or you need a host POWER
machine?
For build purpose, VMs are enough thanks.
I'm not sure about the testing for Francesco Romani, maybe he'll reply
> Eyal.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden"
<ewoud+ovirt(a)kohlvanwijngaarden.nl>
>> To: infra(a)ovirt.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:13:48 AM
>> Subject: Re: Request for 3 PPC64 vm slaves for Jenkins
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:12:45AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>> Il 10/02/2014 23:15, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ha scritto:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>>>> PPC64 support is going to be introduced as new feature in oVirt
3.4.0.
>>>>> So we should start delivering PPC64 packages for arch dependent
packages
>>>>> for both EL6 and Fedora.
>>>>> VMs may be small enough since they should only build nightly vdsm
and
>>>>> ovirt-host-deploy-offline: 1 core, 512Mb ram, 10Gb disk
>>>>> Software needed: minimal install + vdsm and
ovirt-host-deploy-offline
>>>>> build deps.
>>>> Since we only have x86 hardware which run oVirt. Does it have to be a
>>>> PPC64 VM because I don't think we can host that right now.
>>> AFAIK we can run qemu-system-ppc64 also on x86_64. Or am I missing
>>> something?
>> Can we also do this with oVirt as host? Ideally I'd prefer not having to
>> manually host a VM but have oVirt take care of it. Could a VDSM hook
>> possibly solve this if not built in?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Infra mailing list
>> Infra(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>>
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
2:29 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
To: "Aline Manera" <alinefm(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Eyal Edri"
<eedri(a)redhat.com>, "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden"
<ewoud+ovirt(a)kohlvanwijngaarden.nl>
Cc: infra(a)ovirt.org, "Francesco Romani" <fromani(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 1:05:50 PM
Subject: Re: Request for 3 PPC64 vm slaves for Jenkins
Il 12/02/2014 12:46, Aline Manera ha scritto:
> On 02/12/2014 06:08 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>> Maybe aline can help here?
>> as you can see we also need POWER pc slaves, so if you can contribute
>> a server which we can run ppc vms on, it will be great both for kimchi and
>> oVirt.
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am going through the legal stuffs to get POWER machines from IBM
> available to ovirt community.
> But in this first attempt, I am trying to get POWER vms and not a host
> POWER machine.
>
> Sandro, Eyal: Do POWER vms work fine for your proposals? Or you need a host
> POWER machine?
For build purpose, VMs are enough thanks.
I'm not sure about the testing for Francesco Romani, maybe he'll reply
Hi,
for me it's enough to have a qemu-system-ppc64 run, any way is fine.
The reason I'm asking is just to exercise he PPC64 changes recently added on
VDSM, and of course catch as early as possible differences between
x86_64 and PPC64 hosts.
An example to issue I'd like to prevent in the future:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/24332/
Thanks and best regards,
--
Francesco Romani
RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D
Phone: 8261328
IRC: fromani
10:30 a.m.
Il 12/02/2014 01:13, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:12:45AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 10/02/2014 23:15, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>> PPC64 support is going to be introduced as new feature in oVirt 3.4.0.
>>> So we should start delivering PPC64 packages for arch dependent packages for
both EL6 and Fedora.
>>> VMs may be small enough since they should only build nightly vdsm and
ovirt-host-deploy-offline: 1 core, 512Mb ram, 10Gb disk
>>> Software needed: minimal install + vdsm and ovirt-host-deploy-offline build
deps.
>>
>> Since we only have x86 hardware which run oVirt. Does it have to be a
>> PPC64 VM because I don't think we can host that right now.
>
> AFAIK we can run qemu-system-ppc64 also on x86_64. Or am I missing something?
Can we also do this with oVirt as host? Ideally I'd prefer not having to
manually host a VM but have oVirt take care of it. Could a VDSM hook
possibly solve this if not built in?
Never tested such configuration.
CCing VDSM developers about this.
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
3932
days inactive
3934
days old
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Aline Manera -
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden -
Eyal Edri -
Francesco Romani -
Sandro Bonazzola