+1 puppet is a good name and we should defiantly open a repo for it.

e. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden" <ewoud+ovirt(a)kohlvanwijngaarden.nl&gt; > To: infra(a)ovirt.org > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 1:19:29 PM > Subject: New gerrit repo for puppet > > Hello, > > As I mailed before in another thread, I'd like a gerrit repository to > store the puppet environment(s) for the infra team and to replace > https://github.com/ekohl/ovirt-infra-puppet. > > I'd propose the name 'puppet' because it's clear and I don't think it > will conflict with other repositories. If the ovirt project would > maintain a puppet module to manage ovirt using puppet, the naming > convention commonly used would name it puppet-ovirt. > > Permission wise I think ovirt infra should be maintainer. > _______________________________________________ > Infra mailing list > Infra(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 10:04:22AM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 06/01/2013 05:57 PM, Eyal Edri wrote: >> +1 >> >> puppet is a good name and we should defiantly open a repo for it. > > infra-puppet or puppet-infra or admin-puppet maybe? > (I think some context in the name is needed) I'd prefer infra-puppet then because puppet-infra looks too much like the puppet module naming scheme and implies a puppet module.

>> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden" <ewoud+ovirt(a)kohlvanwijngaarden.nl&gt; >>> To: infra(a)ovirt.org >>> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 1:19:29 PM >>> Subject: New gerrit repo for puppet >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> As I mailed before in another thread, I'd like a gerrit repository to >>> store the puppet environment(s) for the infra team and to replace >>> https://github.com/ekohl/ovirt-infra-puppet. >>> >>> I'd propose the name 'puppet' because it's clear and I don't think it >>> will conflict with other repositories. If the ovirt project would >>> maintain a puppet module to manage ovirt using puppet, the naming >>> convention commonly used would name it puppet-ovirt. >>> >>> Permission wise I think ovirt infra should be maintainer. _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra