On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 10:04:22AM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/01/2013 05:57 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>puppet is a good name and we should defiantly open a repo for it.
infra-puppet or puppet-infra or admin-puppet maybe?
(I think some context in the name is needed)
I'd prefer infra-puppet then because puppet-infra looks too much like
the puppet module naming scheme and implies a puppet module.
>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden"
>>Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 1:19:29 PM
>>Subject: New gerrit repo for puppet
>>As I mailed before in another thread, I'd like a gerrit repository to
>>store the puppet environment(s) for the infra team and to replace
>>I'd propose the name 'puppet' because it's clear and I don't
>>will conflict with other repositories. If the ovirt project would
>>maintain a puppet module to manage ovirt using puppet, the naming
>>convention commonly used would name it puppet-ovirt.
>>Permission wise I think ovirt infra should be maintainer.