Bug left in MODIFIED after a new patch pushed
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
Hi all,
Bug [1] was in MODIFIED, then I pushed a new change [2].
The robot did add the change to the bug, but left it in MODIFIED.
Shouldn't it have moved it back to POST?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1185411
[2] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/37503
Best,
--
Didi
--Il7n/DHsA0sMLmDu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It seems that it complains about the product of the bug.
I don't remember (and it was not documented) if it should move rhev bugs or
not.
Eyal please advise.
On 02/04, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
Hi all,
=20
Bug [1] was in MODIFIED, then I pushed a new change [2].
=20
The robot did add the change to the bug, but left it in MODIFIED.
=20
Shouldn't it have moved it back to POST?
=20
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1185411
[2] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/37503
=20
Best,
--=20
Didi
--=20
David Caro
Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605
--Il7n/DHsA0sMLmDu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU0do7AAoJEEBxx+HSYmnDDHgH/31gCWGVnG4oa01pkwUlp3nI
cmPJR78BsCs1MllpBdDLXwz8BI6ndKvBqJ5scGOXqi1E5rmCAGDgCWJXu6YmZCrX
Zcra1rS2lqt/ut8yISiYQxa03pIavycBKncnEXpyc7uFR427BCZqVyZnCu0vHOfR
NFDs+4UDRqcgL4vSmP4pimLQRMFe4i95saHHrySc4rOhuGKkk7yVrrI/M6qML+We
LmvT9JUdyVb/DDMy2pqAlgWDHPu+kTNsWsVfesNdh3JSFAYPGD3sFjoKSmf6lso8
sLyy2dzrRJqy6GaAtUBBt8jiatlBLU3Cn0niXWZDZWUrcJX8hI+qgCHWr4Hg9yk=
=fK5X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Il7n/DHsA0sMLmDu--
3362
days inactive
3362
days old
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
David Caro Estevez -
Yedidyah Bar David