Should we kill the project-planning mailing list?
There hasn't been a post in that list since Nov 2011. It seems to overlap the infra / arch groups and would be a good candate for clean up. -- Thanks Robert Middleswarth @rmiddle (twitter/Freenode IRC) @RobertM (OFTC IRC)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Middleswarth" <robert@middleswarth.net> To: "infra" <infra@ovirt.org> Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2012 4:35:48 AM Subject: Should we kill the project-planning mailing list?
There hasn't been a post in that list since Nov 2011. It seems to overlap the infra / arch groups and would be a good candate for clean up.
-- Thanks Robert Middleswarth @rmiddle (twitter/Freenode IRC) @RobertM (OFTC IRC)
+1. We should consolidate lists as much as possible to reduce duplications / noise.
There hasn't been a post in that list since Nov 2011. It seems to overlap the infra / arch groups and would be a good candate for clean u=
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB18745AC71051C4FAC2A305B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/01/2012 06:35 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote: p. How do you mean to "kill" it? --=20 Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 --------------enigB18745AC71051C4FAC2A305B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iD8DBQFQWfPY2ZIOBq0ODEERAu/CAKCJtw4G/HihMtIfLnXbey0uiOgLrACgiVVY hx31bCslB9H01SRLK4ReCyg= =mwC8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB18745AC71051C4FAC2A305B--
On 09/19/2012 12:33 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On 09/01/2012 06:35 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
There hasn't been a post in that list since Nov 2011. It seems to overlap the infra / arch groups and would be a good candate for clean up. How do you mean to "kill" it?
yes, we no longer need it. Carl.
Hi, On 09/19/2012 06:33 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On 09/01/2012 06:35 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
There hasn't been a post in that list since Nov 2011. It seems to overlap the infra / arch groups and would be a good candate for clean up.
How do you mean to "kill" it?
My personal suggestion: Disable subscriptions, update the list description to indicate that the list is obsolete and inactive, do not advertise the list in the Mailman page. Archives can & should remain online, but we can hide all mention of the list in Mailman & the website. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary Community Action and Impact Open Source and Standards, Red Hat Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF6BE8157EC71DF33D36148B7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/20/2012 02:09 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi, =20 On 09/19/2012 06:33 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On 09/01/2012 06:35 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
There hasn't been a post in that list since Nov 2011. It seems to overlap the infra / arch groups and would be a good candate for clean=
up.
How do you mean to "kill" it? =20 My personal suggestion: Disable subscriptions, update the list description to indicate that the list is obsolete and inactive, do not advertise the list in the Mailman page. Archives can & should remain online, but we can hide all mention of the list in Mailman & the websit= e.
That might be over-kill. :) I think we should do all that except the hiding via Mailman. This list was used privately before the open sourcing to plan the open sourcing of oVirt. It contains interesting and useful historical information. - Karsten --=20 Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 --------------enigF6BE8157EC71DF33D36148B7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iD8DBQFQWxYR2ZIOBq0ODEERAhFdAJ0ZslCir/9RcA0wA9kRxhBQ38wP6QCgpCSz p08BqIDWf5VOremdDtnMoPA= =9kjk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF6BE8157EC71DF33D36148B7--
Hi, On 09/20/2012 03:11 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On 09/20/2012 02:09 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
My personal suggestion: Disable subscriptions, update the list description to indicate that the list is obsolete and inactive, do not advertise the list in the Mailman page. Archives can & should remain online, but we can hide all mention of the list in Mailman & the website.
That might be over-kill. :) I think we should do all that except the hiding via Mailman. This list was used privately before the open sourcing to plan the open sourcing of oVirt. It contains interesting and useful historical information.
I have no strong opinions one way or the other - but I imagine that part of the reason for the suggestion is that inactive lists clutter up the mailman page, and make it harder for newcomers to know easily which lists they should sign up for - thus the suggestion to set the list to not advertise itself on the mailman list. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary Community Action and Impact Open Source and Standards, Red Hat Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13
participants (5)
-
Carl Trieloff -
Dave Neary -
Doron Fediuck -
Karsten 'quaid' Wade -
Robert Middleswarth