This is a multi-part message in MIME format...
------------=_1520333776-20649-136
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918?page=com.atlassian.jir...
]
Barak Korren edited comment on OVIRT-1918 at 3/6/18 10:56 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
{quote}
So, supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C
can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and
get released.
{quote}
This statement is false - what will happen in this case is that a bisection search will
run and isulate the change to project C, while allowing the changes for A and B to pass.
This is the whole point of CQ and the difference between it and the 'experimental'
system it replaced.
[~sbonazzo(a)redhat.com] Unless you need further clarification, I will close this ticket as
WONTFIX.
was (Author: bkorren(a)redhat.com):
{quote}
So, supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C
can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and
get released.
{quote}
This statement is false - what will happen in this case is that a bisection search will
run and isulate the change to project C, while allowing the changes for A and B to pass.
This si the whole point of CQ and the difference between it and the 'experimental'
system it replaced.
[~sbonazzo(a)redhat.com] Unless you need further clarification, I will close this ticket as
WONTFIX.
Single project tests in change-queue-tester
-------------------------------------------
Key: OVIRT-1918
URL:
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918
Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
Issue Type: By-EMAIL
Reporter: sbonazzo
Assignee: infra
Please change change-queue-tester jobs for testing a single project at a
time (ok for multiple patches at once, but from the same project).
Right now if multiple patches are merged between a change-queue-tester
execution and the next one are done, all of them will be tested in the next
run, even if the changes are in different projects.
So, supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C
can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and
get released.
This cause major headaches at least to me, requiring me to go again over
all the HEAD of the projects not being published and run yet again "ci
re-merge please" again and again and again until I'm lucky enough to have
nobody else merging patches or having all the ttested patches pass at once.
I understand the need to reduce the amount of executions of the job since
it takes an hour to execute but right now it's stealing days of execution
for getting a patch landing on tested repo.
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
Red Hat EMEA <
https://www.redhat.com/>
<
https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <
https://redhat.com/trusted>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100081)
------------=_1520333776-20649-136
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html><body>
<pre>[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918?page=com.atlassian.jir...
]</pre>
<h3>Barak Korren edited comment on OVIRT-1918 at 3/6/18 10:56 AM:</h3>
<p>{quote} So, supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C
can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and get released.
{quote}</p>
<p>This statement is false – what will happen in this case is that a
bisection search will run and isulate the change to project C, while allowing the changes
for A and B to pass. This is the whole point of CQ and the difference between it and the
‘experimental’ system it replaced.</p>
<p>[~sbonazzo(a)redhat.com] Unless you need further clarification, I will close this
ticket as WONTFIX.</p>
<p>was (Author: bkorren(a)redhat.com): {quote} So, supposing project A and B are
completely fine, a failure in project C can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead
through the pipeline and get released. {quote}</p>
<p>This statement is false – what will happen in this case is that a
bisection search will run and isulate the change to project C, while allowing the changes
for A and B to pass. This si the whole point of CQ and the difference between it and the
‘experimental’ system it replaced.</p>
<p>[~sbonazzo(a)redhat.com] Unless you need further clarification, I will close this
ticket as WONTFIX.</p>
<blockquote><h3>Single project tests in change-queue-tester</h3>
<pre> Key: OVIRT-1918
URL:
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918
Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
Issue Type: By-EMAIL
Reporter: sbonazzo
Assignee: infra</pre>
<p>Please change change-queue-tester jobs for testing a single project at a time (ok
for multiple patches at once, but from the same project). Right now if multiple patches
are merged between a change-queue-tester execution and the next one are done, all of them
will be tested in the next run, even if the changes are in different projects. So,
supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C can still prevent
changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and get released. This cause major
headaches at least to me, requiring me to go again over all the HEAD of the projects not
being published and run yet again “ci re-merge please” again and again
and again until I'm lucky enough to have nobody else merging patches or having all the
ttested patches pass at once. I understand the need to reduce the amount of executions of
the job since it takes an hour to execute but right now it's stealing days of
execution for getting a patch landing on tested repo. — SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA
<<a
href="https://www.redhat.com/">https://www.redhat.com/</a...
<<a href="https://red.ht/sig">https://red.ht/sig</a>>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <<a
href="https://redhat.com/trusted">https://redhat.com/trusted...
<p>— This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100081)</p>
<img
src="https://u4043402.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/open?upn=i5TMWGV99amJbNxJpS...
alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0"
style="height:1px !important;width:1px !important;border-width:0
!important;margin-top:0 !important;margin-bottom:0 !important;margin-right:0
!important;margin-left:0 !important;padding-top:0 !important;padding-bottom:0
!important;padding-right:0 !important;padding-left:0 !important;"/>
</body></html>
------------=_1520333776-20649-136--