[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-903?page=com. atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- tabpanel&focusedCommentId=23818#comment-23818 ] eyal edri [Administrator] commented on OVIRT-903: ------------------------------------------------- well, depending on the amount of effort needed to update the job, we might want to wait with it until the jobs are moved to an ost suit, which is in progress. On Dec 4, 2016 13:07, "Yedidyah Bar David" <didi(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:06 AM, eyal edri [Administrator] (oVirt atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- tabpanel&focusedCommentId=23805#comment-23805 ] from-master_el7_merged/ Indeed, and I explained in the ticket why it's not enough as-is. Best, -- Didi _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra > master-to-master CI upgrade tests > --------------------------------- > > Key: OVIRT-903 > URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-903 > Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy > Issue Type: By-EMAIL > Reporter: Yedidyah Bar David > Assignee: infra > > Hi all, > Recently a patch to the engine [1] added a new package, > with a certain set of dependencies, which broke upgrade. > This is similar to [2] but for a new package. > CI wasn't affected, I think because of [3]. > To make CI test such flows, we should have a job that: > 1. Builds, installs and sets up the version we want to test > 2. Pushes a dummy change to the local git repo (to force > a new version), build the patched tree, create a yum repo > with the build and add it to yum.repos.d. > 3. yum update > 4. engine-setup > Another option is to revert [3], or to duplicate - have > both "upgrade current to self" and "upgrade latest snapshot > to current". The downside is that it will be checked later > than above plan - instead of in the same build, will only > be tested in the first build that uses the snapshot after > it was updated, and also will be misleading, as the reason > why that job failed will not be apparent (which was why > [3] was added). > Please handle. I can of course try to help. Best, > [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/66999 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321249 > [3] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/67263 > -- > Didi -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.610.2#100023) _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra