5:38 a.m.
Hi,
I would suggest that we would use https for hosting gerrit, currently
you cannot even access it, it'd be great, I am not sure why it would be
non-HTTPS. Even though SSL has it's issues, it's still better than plain
connections.
--
Regards,
Vinzenz Feenstra | Senior Software Engineer
RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D
Phone: +420 532 294 625
IRC: vfeenstr or evilissimo
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
6:30 a.m.
On 12/27/2012 01:38 PM, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
Hi,
I would suggest that we would use https for hosting gerrit, currently
you cannot even access it, it'd be great, I am not sure why it would be
non-HTTPS. Even though SSL has it's issues, it's still better than plain
connections.
just need someone to get a certificate for the host and i'll configure https
midnight
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigC548341100B8F527CE7D7562
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 12/27/2012 04:30 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 12/27/2012 01:38 PM, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest that we would use https for hosting gerrit, currently
> you cannot even access it, it'd be great, I am not sure why it would b=
e
> non-HTTPS. Even though SSL has it's issues, it's still
better than pla=
in
> connections.
>
=20
just need someone to get a certificate for the host and i'll configure
https
Yeah, I decided against self-signed cert for other services to avoid the
trust issues with that. But a certificate authority-sourced SSL cert ...
We can most likely get a certificate through Red Hat; they've offered to
me in the the past for ovirt.org. Should we?
- Karsten
--=20
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
--------------enigC548341100B8F527CE7D7562
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iD8DBQFQ39h82ZIOBq0ODEERAh/fAJ9+xMG08puRiGKcXWUrJkOTelkn3wCePzc6
EGkZ5IWVq6/U6G2kV9WL76g=
=I4q3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigC548341100B8F527CE7D7562--
8:29 a.m.
On 12/30/2012 08:00 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On 12/27/2012 04:30 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 12/27/2012 01:38 PM, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would suggest that we would use https for hosting gerrit, currently
>> you cannot even access it, it'd be great, I am not sure why it would be
>> non-HTTPS. Even though SSL has it's issues, it's still better than plain
>> connections.
>>
>
> just need someone to get a certificate for the host and i'll configure
> https
Yeah, I decided against self-signed cert for other services to avoid the
trust issues with that. But a certificate authority-sourced SSL cert ...
We can most likely get a certificate through Red Hat; they've offered to
me in the the past for ovirt.org. Should we?
+1.
you need one for each dns name of course.
4133
days inactive
4137
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Itamar Heim -
Karsten 'quaid' Wade -
Vinzenz Feenstra