Fwd: Please test git-review RPM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Are these useful to us? That is, are we using 'git-review' for our Gerrit instance? If so, then, yes, packages are useful to us. If yes, then we probably want to check for compatibility, and report back to Pete if we get any problems. - - Karsten - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Please test git-review RPM Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:15:46 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> Reply-To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org> Dear All: I am thinking about packaging git-review (the real one, not Facebook's), and to that end I prepared RPMs that are to be submitted for Fedora. Before I do that, I'd like someone verify that they work. AFAIK both Gluster and OpenStack use Gerrit with git-review. These RPMs come from OpenStack source, and I am very curious if they are compatible with Gluster use, so that we can have one in Fedora. http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.noarch.rpm http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/git-review-1.8-1.fc16.src.rpm Thanks and have a happy New Year, - -- Pete _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPA5Vi2ZIOBq0ODEERAqmrAJ4veOcjfLMFKvKflEyO72T5UaH+hQCeO6dL LmgcSwfotHPNrCEY4WpPnDc= =dHSS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 03:55:14PM -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Are these useful to us?
That is, are we using 'git-review' for our Gerrit instance? If so, then, yes, packages are useful to us.
If yes, then we probably want to check for compatibility, and report back to Pete if we get any problems.
Yes, this is useful (some of us use it already from upstream), and yes the rpm seems to be working. (I hate the requirement to submit from a named branch, but that's a rant for upstream git-review) Dan.
participants (2)
-
Dan Kenigsberg
-
Karsten 'quaid' Wade