On 07/09/2014 04:32 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:

Hi, comparing 3.4 publisher with master publisher I see: for master: Copied 3 artifacts from "ovirt-node-iso_master_merged" for 3.4: Copied 11 artifacts from "ovirt-node_master_create-iso_merged"

Supposing both jobs should take sources from master I think that either both or only one of them should be collected by both 3.4 and master publishers.

If the assumption on the source is wrong we've a naming issue here. Can you look into this? Thanks.

Not that either has run in months, but: ovirt-node-iso_master_merged generates the ovirt-node ISO image inside an RPM wrapper, suitable for upgrading through the engine. ovirt-node_master_create-iso_merged (and this could have a better name, even ovirt-node_master_merged would be sufficient, since the packages built are just the ones from the ovirt-node specfile) generates the ovirt-node RPMs which are put down on the ISO itself and the tools necessary to edit it -- ovirt-node-plugin-snmp, ovirt-node, edit-node. It makes sense for ovirt-node_master_create-iso_merged to be pulled into a yum repo to make it easier for users to add plugins and use edit-node. ovirt-node-iso_master_merged doesn't need to be in a yum repo at all, unless you want to present 220MB RPMs for convenience, so users can "yumdownloader..." for upgrades from the engine.