8:16 p.m.
Building up the marketing group, I'm requesting a marketing@ mailing list be built.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
-Theron
8:51 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
------enig2KHPUCIPGBHJDUOXXDELR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 03/13/2013 10:16 AM, Theron Conrey wrote:
Building up the marketing group, I'm requesting a marketing@
mailing li=
st be built. =20
=20
Let me know if you have any questions.
Resist the list! Down with new lists! Do all work on arch@ and love it!
Actually, no questions, +1 from me.
The process for an Infra maintainers (or anyone with sudo on
lists.ovirt.org):
http://www.ovirt.org/Creating_and_configuring_mailing_lists
Presuming all +1s on this idea, does anyone else want to learn how or do
this list creation? Otherwise, it's <5 min for me to do it.
Oh, for giggles, shall we open a ticket? That helps us track and
complete the request.
http://fedorahosted.org/ovirt
Infra folks - I'm not really thinking it's our role to approve the
creation of lists, just to do the work. I think Theron's request is an
obvious "yes" so I don't personally feel we need to ask for further
permission.
Where is the optimal place to get project approval on new lists? board@
could be it, but arch@ seems like really the best one. Or should we just
let people file a ticket and we only ask them to go get approval if it's
unclear to us if it's an obvious yes?
- Karsten
--=20
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
------enig2KHPUCIPGBHJDUOXXDELR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iD8DBQFRQLy82ZIOBq0ODEERAmh5AJ42yPX2w/tges34jv3iDZA90DZ6GwCfePef
s+zWrDmi5mQDDOFQZcvXhFo=
=ib1o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------enig2KHPUCIPGBHJDUOXXDELR--
4:29 a.m.
On 03/13/2013 01:51 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On 03/13/2013 10:16 AM, Theron Conrey wrote:
> Building up the marketing group, I'm requesting a marketing@ mailing list be
built.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions.
Resist the list! Down with new lists! Do all work on arch@ and love it!
Actually, no questions, +1 from me.
+1
The process for an Infra maintainers (or anyone with sudo on
lists.ovirt.org):
http://www.ovirt.org/Creating_and_configuring_mailing_lists
Presuming all +1s on this idea, does anyone else want to learn how or do
this list creation? Otherwise, it's <5 min for me to do it.
Oh, for giggles, shall we open a ticket? That helps us track and
complete the request.
http://fedorahosted.org/ovirt
Infra folks - I'm not really thinking it's our role to approve the
creation of lists, just to do the work. I think Theron's request is an
obvious "yes" so I don't personally feel we need to ask for further
permission.
Was a pretty obvious yes to me, which is why i sent Theron here.
Where is the optimal place to get project approval on new lists? board@
could be it, but arch@ seems like really the best one. Or should we just
let people file a ticket and we only ask them to go get approval if it's
unclear to us if it's an obvious yes?
I think point people either to the ticketing (we should get a redirect
or something setup so it's on an ovirt.org subdomain) or to infra@ (or
maybe a frontend email address for the ticketing?).
If we're unsure, we can ack for details from the requester while we seek
approval from the board or arch lists if necessary.
Mike
- Karsten
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
4:29 a.m.
On 03/13/2013 09:29 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On 03/13/2013 01:51 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 10:16 AM, Theron Conrey wrote:
>> Building up the marketing group, I'm requesting a marketing@ mailing
>> list be built.
>>
>> Let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Resist the list! Down with new lists! Do all work on arch@ and love it!
>
> Actually, no questions, +1 from me.
+1
>
> The process for an Infra maintainers (or anyone with sudo on
> lists.ovirt.org):
>
> http://www.ovirt.org/Creating_and_configuring_mailing_lists
>
> Presuming all +1s on this idea, does anyone else want to learn how or do
> this list creation? Otherwise, it's <5 min for me to do it.
>
> Oh, for giggles, shall we open a ticket? That helps us track and
> complete the request.
>
> http://fedorahosted.org/ovirt
>
> Infra folks - I'm not really thinking it's our role to approve the
> creation of lists, just to do the work. I think Theron's request is an
> obvious "yes" so I don't personally feel we need to ask for further
> permission.
Was a pretty obvious yes to me, which is why i sent Theron here.
>
> Where is the optimal place to get project approval on new lists? board@
> could be it, but arch@ seems like really the best one. Or should we just
> let people file a ticket and we only ask them to go get approval if it's
> unclear to us if it's an obvious yes?
I think point people either to the ticketing (we should get a redirect
or something setup so it's on an ovirt.org subdomain) or to infra@ (or
maybe a frontend email address for the ticketing?).
If we're unsure, we can
ack
s/ack/ask
for details from the requester while we seek
approval from the board or arch lists if necessary.
Mike
>
> - Karsten
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
2:56 a.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
------enig2LOQSSJQNCEJVRLQHWEUO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 03/13/2013 10:51 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
=20
Where is the optimal place to get project approval on new lists? board@=
could be it, but arch@ seems like really the best one. Or should we
jus=
t
let people file a ticket and we only ask them to go get approval if
it'=
s
unclear to us if it's an obvious yes?
I completely forgot that the oVirt Marketing group (and by extension,
its mailing list) were approved by the Board at the oVirt workshop at
NetApp last January. (Asking people to mention approvals and stuff would
be a good part to add to a simple how-to-get-a-list process.)
I'm going ahead and creating this list immediately, as per the
previously mentioned process.
- Karsten
--=20
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
------enig2LOQSSJQNCEJVRLQHWEUO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iD8DBQFRQmOq2ZIOBq0ODEERAoS1AJ9eknT5J6NiWS1M6hXsLXhAOA/fEwCg26l/
Y5v7AQId8F+vX5VFfs23y7c=
=rqeL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------enig2LOQSSJQNCEJVRLQHWEUO--
4271
days inactive
4272
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Karsten 'quaid' Wade -
Mike Burns -
Theron Conrey