On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:58:15AM -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 16:08 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:45:44AM -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 09:29 -0400, Vered Volansky wrote:
> > > The above wiki(
http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Installing_VDSM_from_rpm ) has
the following instruction:
> > > wget
http://www.ovirt.org/releases/nightly/fedora/16/ovirt-engine.repo -P
/etc/yum.repos.d/
> > >
> > > 1. Need to change to the actual fedora 17 url.
> > > 2. The updated url hasn't got ovirt-engine.repo in it.
> >
> > You can get vdsm directly from Fedora, yes. You can also get it from
> > the
ovirt.org repos. The .repo file no longer exists, but there is an
> > ovirt-release rpm available. I've updated the wiki to reflect that.
>
> I think we should remove empty directories from the release overview and
> the ovirt-release-*.rpm from the root. Those can only confuse the user.
What directories are empty? I don't see any empty directories.
Fedora 18 and
Fedora 19 nightlies, i386 dirs and deb. I'd also get rid
of beta.old.20120808. In essence run:
find -depth -type d -exec rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty {} \+
rm -rf beta.old.20120808
As for the ovirt-release rpms, we intentionally put them in the top
level so they're easy to access.
But where do they point to? stable?