[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=35971#comment-35971 ] eyal edri commented on OVIRT-1918: ---------------------------------- Maybe we need to use always the official release repo as fallback to tested? In case a specific PKG failed to build and it's maintainer didn't make sure to fix it and redeploy, it makes sense to get missing pkgs from latest official release, as we do in OST. Once the maintainer of the project will build a new image and it passes, it will be in tested. On Mar 6, 2018 14:02, "sbonazzo (oVirt JIRA)" <jira@ovirt-jira.atlassian.net> wrote: [ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=35970#comment-35970 ] sbonazzo commented on OVIRT-1918: I'm not sure that the bisection really works then, since we have still packages released 2 months ago not yet landing on tested. I don't recall to have seen any job triggered automatically after a change-queue-tester failure doing bisection tests. Single project tests in change-queue-tester Key: OVIRT-1918 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: By-EMAIL Reporter: sbonazzo Assignee: infra Please change change-queue-tester jobs for testing a single project at a time (ok for multiple patches at once, but from the same project). Right now if multiple patches are merged between a change-queue-tester execution and the next one are done, all of them will be tested in the next run, even if the changes are in different projects. So, supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and get released. This cause major headaches at least to me, requiring me to go again over all the HEAD of the projects not being published and run yet again “ci re-merge please” again and again and again until I'm lucky enough to have nobody else merging patches or having all the ttested patches pass at once. I understand the need to reduce the amount of executions of the job since it takes an hour to execute but right now it's stealing days of execution for getting a patch landing on t ested repo. — SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA < https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. < https://redhat.com/trusted> — This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100081)

Single project tests in change-queue-tester -------------------------------------------

Key: OVIRT-1918 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1918 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: By-EMAIL Reporter: sbonazzo Assignee: infra

Please change change-queue-tester jobs for testing a single project at a time (ok for multiple patches at once, but from the same project). Right now if multiple patches are merged between a change-queue-tester execution and the next one are done, all of them will be tested in the next run, even if the changes are in different projects. So, supposing project A and B are completely fine, a failure in project C can still prevent changes in A and B to go ahead through the pipeline and get released. This cause major headaches at least to me, requiring me to go again over all the HEAD of the projects not being published and run yet again "ci re-merge please" again and again and again until I'm lucky enough to have nobody else merging patches or having all the ttested patches pass at once. I understand the need to reduce the amount of executions of the job since it takes an hour to execute but right now it's stealing days of execution for getting a patch landing on tested repo. -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>

-- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100081)