I have added more specific wording to the announcement and the Quick Start guide.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
To: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>, "infra"
<infra(a)ovirt.org>, "Brian Proffitt" <bproffit(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 8:12:47 AM
Subject: Re: thoughts while looking at logwatch
Il 25/02/2014 13:59, Itamar Heim ha scritto:
> On 02/25/2014 02:42 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> I think they may have passed unnoticed so let me resume here what I wrote
>> in a previous email.
>> 1) we should make it more clear on the website which version of Fedora are
>> supported. We still have people trying to download oVirt 3.3 stable on
>> Fedora 12, 15, 16 and 18.
> brian --^
>> 2) It seems that we should also start building epel7 packages:
>> Fedora already started:
>> And centos has a build:
> +1 for .el7 builds.
>> 3) Looking backward at Fedora 20 support missing, I think we should also
>> start building on Fedora Rawhide
> the problem is the minute it breaks (could be us, could be fedora), its
> broken till fixed, which may take a while, so further regressions can
> for example, fedora 20 comes with wildfly (aka jboss-as-8), which isn't
> something trivial to fix (without breaking jboss-as-7 support).
I'm not saying we should rely on having Rawhide working.
I'm saying that would be useful have a warning when it's not working so we
can take a look and see if we're diverging from Rawhide.
Maybe we can sync with Fedora Virtualization SIG on this, they may help us as
we help them discovering issues on Rawhide.
> i wonder if we shouldn't skip f20 and aim for f21 by now...
+1 for Fedora 21 - oVirt 3.5.0 skipping f20 for < 3.5.0
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com