2:27 p.m.
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was
talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for
feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I
tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission
statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure
team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's
project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to
contribute to the oVirt project.
Thanks
Robert
2:48 p.m.
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was
talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for
feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I
tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission
statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
Proposed Mission Statement:
The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure
team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's
project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to
contribute to the oVirt project.
A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt
project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
system administrators.
Thanks
Robert
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
2:49 p.m.
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was
> talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for
> feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I
> tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission
> statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
>
> Proposed Mission Statement:
>
> The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure
> team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's
> project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
> system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to
> contribute to the oVirt project.
A few nits and reorganizations...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt
project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
system administrators.
I like that one better :)
> Thanks
> Robert
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
2:58 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
>On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
>>This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was
>>talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for
>>feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I
>>tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission
>>statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
>>
>>Proposed Mission Statement:
>>
>>The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure
>>team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's
>>project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
>>system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to
>>contribute to the oVirt project.
>A few nits and reorganizations...
>
>The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
>volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt
>project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
>system administrators.
I like that one better :)
Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its
purpose' I mostly like it. Not
sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference
between a professional manner and following accepted professional
standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
3:09 p.m.
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> >On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> >>This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was
> >>talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for
> >>feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I
> >>tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission
> >>statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
> >>
> >>Proposed Mission Statement:
> >>
> >>The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure
> >>team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's
> >>project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
> >>system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to
> >>contribute to the oVirt project.
> >A few nits and reorganizations...
> >
> >The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
> >volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt
> >project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
> >system administrators.
> I like that one better :)
Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it. Not
sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference
between a professional manner and following accepted professional
standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It
seems to make it a bit wordy...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure
following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
3:10 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 12:58 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth
wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
>>> This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission
>>> statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some
>>> suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments
>>> into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was
>>> talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of
>>> other projects and this is what I came up with.
>>>
>>> Proposed Mission Statement:
>>>
>>> The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services
>>> infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a
>>> professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure
>>> following accepted professional standards of system
>>> administrators. These administrators volunteer their time
>>> to contribute to the oVirt project.
>> A few nits and reorganizations...
>>
>> The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made
>> up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional
>> manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted
>> professional standards of system administrators.
> I like that one better :)
Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it.
Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the
difference between a professional manner and following accepted
professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards
as well.
I think we could possible drop the professional manner - that may be a
mental barrier to people, "Oh, we can't be playful? This sounds so
corporate. Etc."
For example:
"The oVirt Infrastructure (Infra) project is a community services
infrastructure team made up of volunteers. Its purpose is to manage
the oVirt project's infrastructure following both accepted
professional standards of system administrators and the open source
way."
The last bit is added to support our lack of a definition of
"community services infrastructure", which I use to mean, "Follows the
open source way in providing services - open, transparent,
appropriately low/high barriers, common tools, avoid NIH, etc."
Is "the open source way" sufficient without further explanation, or do
we need:
"... the open source way, meaning anyone is welcome to join the
project and gain trust and access through merit."
... and now it doesn't sound like a mission anymore. Would it be too
much to actually make a methodology part of the mission? I.e.,
teaching others to fish while fishing with them as a mission.
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP/IxA2ZIOBq0ODEERAl3DAJ48n6NgZDTMNhEjkGwQZv5Vc351/gCggMcM
or4FdV8udyUxspdlkqbRkSA=
=Degf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3:11 p.m.
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:09 -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> > On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> > >On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> > >>This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement was
> > >>talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask for
> > >>feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement. I
> > >>tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at mission
> > >>statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
> > >>
> > >>Proposed Mission Statement:
> > >>
> > >>The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services infrastructure
> > >>team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the oVirt's
> > >>project infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
> > >>system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time to
> > >>contribute to the oVirt project.
> > >A few nits and reorganizations...
> > >
> > >The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
> > >volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the oVirt
> > >project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards of
> > >system administrators.
> > I like that one better :)
> Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it.
Not
> sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference
> between a professional manner and following accepted professional
> standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It
seems to make it a bit wordy...
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure
following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Fixing It -> Its
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure
following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
3:17 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:11:05PM -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:09 -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> > > On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> > > >On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> > > >>This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement
was
> > > >>talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask
for
> > > >>feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement.
I
> > > >>tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at
mission
> > > >>statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
> > > >>
> > > >>Proposed Mission Statement:
> > > >>
> > > >>The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services
infrastructure
> > > >>team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the
oVirt's
> > > >>project infrastructure following accepted professional standards
of
> > > >>system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time
to
> > > >>contribute to the oVirt project.
> > > >A few nits and reorganizations...
> > > >
> > > >The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
> > > >volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the
oVirt
> > > >project's infrastructure following accepted professional standards
of
> > > >system administrators.
> > > I like that one better :)
> > Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like
it. Not
> > sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference
> > between a professional manner and following accepted professional
> > standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
>
> I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It
> seems to make it a bit wordy...
>
> The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
> volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure
> following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Fixing It -> Its
The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure
following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Trimming it further:
The infra team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure
services by following accepted professional standards of system
administrators.
3:18 p.m.
On 07/10/2012 04:10 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 12:58 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth
> wrote:
>> On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
>>>> This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission
>>>> statement was talked about and I was asked to send out some
>>>> suggestions and ask for feedback and combine the comments
>>>> into a good mission statement. I tired to take what was
>>>> talked about in the chat and looked at mission statements of
>>>> other projects and this is what I came up with.
>>>>
>>>> Proposed Mission Statement:
>>>>
>>>> The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services
>>>> infrastructure team. It purpose is to manage in a
>>>> professional manner the oVirt's project infrastructure
>>>> following accepted professional standards of system
>>>> administrators. These administrators volunteer their time
>>>> to contribute to the oVirt project.
>>> A few nits and reorganizations...
>>>
>>> The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made
>>> up of volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional
>>> manner, the oVirt project's infrastructure following accepted
>>> professional standards of system administrators.
>> I like that one better :)
> Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly like it.
> Not sure about the double professional in there. What's the
> difference between a professional manner and following accepted
> professional standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards
> as well.
I think we could possible drop the professional manner - that may be a
mental barrier to people, "Oh, we can't be playful? This sounds so
corporate. Etc."
For example:
"The oVirt Infrastructure (Infra) project is a community services
infrastructure team made up of volunteers. Its purpose is to manage
the oVirt project's infrastructure following both accepted
professional standards of system administrators and the open source
way."
We are stating the community services that implies "in the open
source
way" so if you want open source in the mission statement we could tweak
the community services line.
The last bit is added to support our lack of a definition of
"community services infrastructure", which I use to mean, "Follows the
open source way in providing services - open, transparent,
appropriately low/high barriers, common tools, avoid NIH, etc."
Is "the open source way" sufficient without further explanation, or do
we need:
"... the open source way, meaning anyone is welcome to join the
project and gain trust and access through merit."
To long mission
statements are short and sweet. Also getting off the
main focus running the infrastructure for the project.
... and now it doesn't sound like a mission anymore. Would it be too
much to actually make a methodology part of the mission? I.e.,
teaching others to fish while fishing with them as a mission.
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP/IxA2ZIOBq0ODEERAl3DAJ48n6NgZDTMNhEjkGwQZv5Vc351/gCggMcM
or4FdV8udyUxspdlkqbRkSA=
=Degf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
3:22 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:17:44PM +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:11:05PM -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:09 -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> > > > On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> > > > >On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> > > > >>This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission
statement was
> > > > >>talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and
ask for
> > > > >>feedback and combine the comments into a good mission
statement. I
> > > > >>tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at
mission
> > > > >>statements of other projects and this is what I came up
with.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Proposed Mission Statement:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services
infrastructure
> > > > >>team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the
oVirt's
> > > > >>project infrastructure following accepted professional
standards of
> > > > >>system administrators. These administrators volunteer their
time to
> > > > >>contribute to the oVirt project.
> > > > >A few nits and reorganizations...
> > > > >
> > > > >The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made
up of
> > > > >volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner,
the oVirt
> > > > >project's infrastructure following accepted professional
standards of
> > > > >system administrators.
> > > > I like that one better :)
> > > Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly
like it. Not
> > > sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference
> > > between a professional manner and following accepted professional
> > > standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
> >
> > I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It
> > seems to make it a bit wordy...
> >
> > The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
> > volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure
> > following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
>
> Fixing It -> Its
>
> The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
> volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure
> following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Trimming it further:
The infra team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure
services by following accepted professional standards of system
administrators.
And with the comments from IRC:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following accepted professional standards of
system administrators and the open source way.
3:24 p.m.
On 07/10/2012 04:17 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:11:05PM -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 16:09 -0400, Mike Burns wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:58 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
>>>> On 07/10/2012 03:48 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:27 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
>>>>>> This week in the infra meeting the topic of a mission statement
was
>>>>>> talked about and I was asked to send out some suggestions and ask
for
>>>>>> feedback and combine the comments into a good mission statement.
I
>>>>>> tired to take what was talked about in the chat and looked at
mission
>>>>>> statements of other projects and this is what I came up with.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Proposed Mission Statement:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Infrastructure (infra) team is a community services
infrastructure
>>>>>> team. It purpose is to manage in a professional manner the
oVirt's
>>>>>> project infrastructure following accepted professional standards
of
>>>>>> system administrators. These administrators volunteer their time
to
>>>>>> contribute to the oVirt project.
>>>>> A few nits and reorganizations...
>>>>>
>>>>> The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up
of
>>>>> volunteers. It purpose is to manage, in a professional manner, the
oVirt
>>>>> project's infrastructure following accepted professional
standards of
>>>>> system administrators.
>>>> I like that one better :)
>>> Provided you change 'It purpose' to 'Its purpose' I mostly
like it. Not
>>> sure about the double professional in there. What's the difference
>>> between a professional manner and following accepted professional
>>> standards? Maybe make it modern professional standards as well.
>> I missed the double professional. Not sure how modern fits there. It
>> seems to make it a bit wordy...
>>
>> The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
>> volunteers. It purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure
>> following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
> Fixing It -> Its
>
> The infra team is a community services infrastructure team made up of
> volunteers. Its purpose is to manage the oVirt project's infrastructure
> following accepted professional standards of system administrators.
Trimming it further:
The infra team is a volunteer effort to provide community infrastructure
services by following accepted professional standards of system
administrators.
Incorporating in the suggestions from IRC and the thread.
The oVirt's infra team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure
services by following accepted open standards of system
administrators.
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
3:29 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following accepted professional
standards of system administrators and the open source way.
OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements.
I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read
"following accepted professional standards of the open source way."
Perhaps:
"The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted
professional standards of system administrators."
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB
5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4=
=u0no
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3:47 p.m.
On 07/10/2012 04:29 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
> infrastructure services by following accepted professional
> standards of system administrators and the open source way.
OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements.
I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read
"following accepted professional standards of the open source way."
Perhaps:
"The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted
professional standards of system administrators."
What about:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following "The Open Source Way" and accepted
professional standards of system administrators.
That works for me.
Thanks
Robert
- - Karsten
- --
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB
5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4=
=u0no
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
4:42 p.m.
On 07/10/2012 04:47 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:29 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
>> The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
>> infrastructure services by following accepted professional
>> standards of system administrators and the open source way.
> OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements.
>
> I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read
> "following accepted professional standards of the open source way."
> Perhaps:
>
> "The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
> infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted
> professional standards of system administrators."
What about:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following "The Open Source Way" and accepted
professional standards of system administrators.
Another option is:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following the tenants of open source and accepted
professional standards of system administrators.
That works for me.
Thanks
Robert
> - - Karsten
> - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
> http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
> @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB
> 5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4=
> =u0no
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
_______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
4:48 p.m.
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 17:42 -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:47 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 04:29 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
>>> The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
>>> infrastructure services by following accepted professional
>>> standards of system administrators and the open source way.
>> OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements.
>>
>> I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read
>> "following accepted professional standards of the open source way."
>> Perhaps:
>>
>> "The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
>> infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted
>> professional standards of system administrators."
> What about:
>
> The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
> infrastructure services by following "The Open Source Way" and accepted
> professional standards of system administrators.
>
Another option is:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following the tenants of open source and accepted
professional standards of system administrators.
Assuming you mean "tenets" instead of "tenants", I like this.
> That works for me.
>
> Thanks
> Robert
>> - - Karsten
>> - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
>> http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
>> @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB
>> 5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4=
>> =u0no
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Infra mailing list
>> Infra(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
4:50 p.m.
On 07/10/2012 05:42 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:47 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 04:29 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/10/2012 01:22 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
>>> The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
>>> infrastructure services by following accepted professional
>>> standards of system administrators and the open source way.
>> OK, I like this now, it's maybe a bit long? but has all the elements.
>>
>> I do see the final clauses get confusing so that it can be read
>> "following accepted professional standards of the open source way."
>> Perhaps:
>>
>> "The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
>> infrastructure services by following the open source way and accepted
>> professional standards of system administrators."
> What about:
>
> The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
> infrastructure services by following "The Open Source Way" and accepted
> professional standards of system administrators.
>
Another option is:
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following the tenants of open source and
accepted
professional standards of system administrators.
It helps to use the right word. :)
The oVirt Infra Team is a volunteer effort to provide community
infrastructure services by following the tenets of open source and accepted
professional standards of system administrators.
> That works for me.
>
> Thanks
> Robert
>> - - Karsten
>> - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
>> http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
>> @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iD8DBQFP/JDD2ZIOBq0ODEERAgipAJ98Fvg20u7i9TzaVIlvWRY4TQAC5wCgl4GB
>> 5JNAJ8/ioawKk1cWCzeWpD4=
>> =u0no
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Infra mailing list
>> Infra(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
4306
days inactive
4306
days old
15 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden -
Karsten 'quaid' Wade -
Mike Burns -
Robert Middleswarth