On 03/21 15:29, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:07 PM, David Caro <dcaro@redhat.com> wrote:
Probably. I'm wondering if there's any point in the merge process. Simply throwing all the RPMs into a single directory should be good enough for the hosts to take the latest greatest anyway, no?
Yes, I agree I think that the original idea was to have a 'generic' reposync, then sync everything, and only extract the rpms for the distros that run in the prefix to create the internal repo, but right now we are using a custom reposync conf per job, tailored down already.
Y.
_______________________________________________ lago-devel mailing list lago-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/lago-devel
-- David Caro
Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro@redhat.com IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat} Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605
-- David Caro Red Hat S.L. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro@redhat.com IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat} Web: www.redhat.com RHT Global #: 82-62605