Ive made progress on using pure cloud-init on the centos glance images to
get the vagrant pre-requisites included and usable but so far thats
introduced two issues that still make template exporting within Lago
desirable:
1. Time and network resources to download packages as well as CPU/memory
bloating from repeated installations of the same packages
2. Unable to test network configuration of vagrant, which is a large
part of vagrant to leave untested
1. By that i mean dhcp/static/multiple network interfaces via blocks
such as [1] and [2]
In the mean time I'm contemplating using the vagrant/ruby sdk to make
`vagrant package` export as an oVirt template which would let me call that
in the middle of an ovirt-system-tests suite, if I'm not mistaken?
[1]
config.vm.network :private_network,
:ovirt__network_name => 'ovirtmgmt' #DHCP
[2]
config.vm.network :private_network,
:ovirt__ip => '192.168.2.198', :ovirt__network_name =>
'ovirtmgmt',
:ovirt__gateway => '192.168.2.125', :ovirt__netmask =>
'255.255.0.0',
:ovirt__dns_servers => '192.168.2.1', :ovirt__dns_search =>
'test.local'
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Marc Young <3vilpenguin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Per cloud-init, I think that's doable. I added support for cloud-init so
> Ill see if that can get me going on an easy path.
>
Regretfully there's something wrong with the cloud-init on the CirrOS
image we download, so it doesn't work well.
Two alternatives I can think of:
1. Download a different image - CentOS and Fedora both work well, for
example. The downside is that it's a bit slow.
2. Upload an image using the upload API. This has the advantage that it's
(1) quicker and (2) will add an additional test to ovirt-system-tests,
which is always a good idea. There's already an example available (
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk/blob/master/
sdk/examples/upload_disk.py) .
Downside: will take a bit of space on the git repo, if the image will be
on o-s-t git repo.
>
> Per uploading: I'm not sure. This might be pretty complex. Vagrant has a
> concept of boxes (for non local files its usually just a zip folder with a
> metadata manifest) [1] and uploading to their cloud platform atlas [2] but
> that kind of gets outside the realm of Vagrant and more into the niche that
> Packer[3] fits.
>
Packer support for oVirt is waiting for the Go SDK and for someone to
implement it.
Y.
> There has been some work on packer with qemu[4] but not oVirt so possibly
> thats a good place for another project to fit (ovirt packer provider)
>
> [1]
https://github.com/myoung34/vagrant-ovirt4/tree/master/example_box
> [2]
https://www.vagrantup.com/docs/boxes.html
> [3]
https://www.packer.io/
> [4]
https://www.packer.io/docs/builders/qemu.html
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 24 August 2017 at 15:35, Marc Young <3vilpenguin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Vagrant requires coming up from a template (and a modified one at that
>> [1].
>>
>> I was wondering about this approach. Could things be changed so that a
>> vanilla image (Like the ones hosted on oVirt Glance) and a cloud-init
>> script would be sufficient?
>>
>> It would be even better if Vargant could upload the images from
>> libvirt boxes directly into oVirt.
>>
>> --
>> Barak Korren
>> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
>> Red Hat EMEA
>>
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. |
redhat.com/trusted
>>
>
>