[ovirt-users] Re: Is teamd supported on 4.3?

On Tue, 14 May 2019 11:08:55 +0200 Valentin Bajrami <valentin.bajrami(a)target-holding.nl&gt; wrote: > Hi Dominik and thanks for the quick reply. Purely the load balancing for > LACP support and the low overhead. Since teamd is probably going to be > the future I wanted to have oVirt using it. Furthermore, teamd is much > more flexible to extend, add new interfaces, change priorities and you > name it. > > It would be great if teamd support was added in the upcoming oVirt > releases. I've seen there is an RFE for the same question I asked here. > Thanks Valentin for your nice explanation. Would you comment this on the RFE Bug 1351510 - [RFE] Support using Team devices instead of bond devices or may I copy your text there? > Thanks > > On 5/13/19 9:26 PM, Dominik Holler wrote: >> On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:30:11 +0200 >> Valentin Bajrami <valentin.bajrami(a)target-holding.nl&gt; wrote: >> >>> Hello guys, >>> >>> Next week, I'm planning to deploy ovirt-node 4.3 on a few hosts. I've >>> been running bonds for the past years but I'd like to know if teaming >>> (teamd) is also supported with this version.  >>> >> No, unfortunately not. >> May I ask why you want to use teaming instead of bonding? >> >> >>> My current package version(s): >>> >>> OS Version: | RHEL - 7 - 6.1810.2.el7.centos >>> OS Description: | oVirt Node 4.3.1 >>> Kernel Version: | 3.10.0 - 957.5.1.el7.x86_64 >>> KVM Version: | 2.12.0 - 18.el7_6.3.1 >>> LIBVIRT Version: | libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.4 >>> VDSM Version: | vdsm-4.30.9-1.el7 >>> SPICE Version: | 0.14.0 - 6.el7_6.1 >>> GlusterFS Version: | glusterfs-5.3-2.el7 >>> CEPH Version: | librbd1-10.2.5-4.el7 >>> Open vSwitch Version: | openvswitch-2.10.1-3.el7 >>> Kernel Features: | PTI: 1, IBRS: 0, RETP: 1 >>> VNC Encryption: | Disabled >>> >>> Is anyone running teamd on this version ? >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>>