You can find attached the benchmarks on the host and guest. I find the
differences not so big though...
Le 09/09/2021 à 13:40, Nir Soffer a écrit :
There are few issues with this test:
- you don't use oflag=direct or conv=fsync, so this may test copying data
to the host page cache, instead of writing data to storage
- This tests only sequential write, which is the best case for any
kind of storage
- Using synchronous I/O - every write wait for the previous write
completion
- Using single process
- 2g is too small, may test your cache performance
Try to test using fio - attached fio script that tests sequential and
random io with
various queue depth.
You can use it like this:
fio --filename=/path/to/fio.data --output=test.out bench.fio
Test both on the host, and in the VM. This will give you more detailed
results that may help to evaluate the issue, and it may help Gluster
folks to advise on tuning your storage.
Nir
--
téïcée <
https://www.teicee.com/?pk_campaign=Email> *Mathieu Valois*
Bureau Caen: Quartier Kœnig - 153, rue Géraldine MOCK - 14760
Bretteville-sur-Odon
Bureau Vitré: Zone de la baratière - 12, route de Domalain - 35500 Vitré
02 72 34 13 20 |
www.teicee.com <
https://www.teicee.com/?pk_campaign=Email>
téïcée sur facebook <
https://www.facebook.com/teicee> téïcée sur twitter
<
https://twitter.com/Teicee_fr> téïcée sur linkedin
<
https://www.linkedin.com/company/t-c-e> téïcée sur viadeo
<
https://fr.viadeo.com/fr/company/teicee> Datadocké