Re: [ovirt-users] Is it a plausible configuration?

From: "Kiril L" <neohidra(a)gmail.com&gt; To: users(a)ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 4:25:30 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Is it a plausible configuration? On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Kiril L" <neohidra(a)gmail.com&gt; >> To: users(a)ovirt.org >> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 3:32:52 PM >> Subject: [ovirt-users] Is it a plausible configuration? >> >> Would you please tell me if this configuration is doable or there is >> something that i am missing? >> >> I would like to use only two servers (X and Y) for VDI and Gluster >> based storage. >> Hosted engine for oVirt and replicated volumes between X and Y for the >> gluster storage. Is a third machine Z a must? > > It works also with just two hosts but it's not that safe: a replica-2 > GlusterFS volume affected by a split-brain issue could be not self-healing > while with replica-3 you could rely on quorum enforcement just cause you > are using an odd host number. > > For oVirt 3.6 we are working on > http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine_Hyper_Converged_Gluster_... > > >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> I do not like the risk part! In that case will have to wait for a third machine then. So in future there will be something useful for me but i did not get it - what exactly will be different between ovirt 3.5 with quoum enforcment and ovirt 3.6 with Hyper Converged Gluster Support?

_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users