I am on Cent OS 6.5 and i am using:
[root@node1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep gluster
glusterfs-rdma-3.4.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-server-3.4.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-fuse-3.4.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-libs-3.4.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-3.4.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-api-3.4.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-cli-3.4.2-1.el6.x86_64
vdsm-gluster-4.13.3-3.el6.noarch
[root@node1 ~]# uname -a
Linux
node1.hq.imos.net 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Nov 22 03:15:09
UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Thanks, Mario
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Samuli Heinonen <samppah(a)neutraali.net>wrote:
Hello,
What version of GlusterFS you are using?
ml ml <mliebherr99(a)googlemail.com> kirjoitti 8.2.2014 kello 21.24:
anyone?
On Friday, February 7, 2014, ml ml <mliebherr99(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> i set up a Cluster with 2 Nodes and Glusterfs.
>
>
> gluster> volume info all
>
> Volume Name: Repl2
> Type: Replicate
> Volume ID: 8af9b282-8b60-4d71-a0fd-9116b8fdcca7
> Status: Started
> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: node1.local:/data
> Brick2: node2.local:/data
> Options Reconfigured:
> auth.allow: *
> user.cifs: enable
> nfs.disable: off
>
>
> I turned node2 off. Just to make sure i have not network bottle neck and
> that it will not replicate for my first benchmarks.
>
>
> My first test with bonnie on my local raw disk of node1 gave me 130MB/sec
> write speed.
> Then i did the same test on my cluster dir /data: 130MB/sec
> Then i did the write test in a freshly installed Debian 7 vm: 10MB/sec
>
> This is terrible and i wonder why?!
>
> My tests where made with:
> bonnie++ -u root -s <double mem) -d <dir>
>
> Here are my bonnie results:
http://oi62.tinypic.com/20aara0.jpg
>
>
> Since node2 is turned off, this cant be a network bottle neck.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users