Re: [Users] Panic on FreeBSD guest with >1 CPU

27 nov 2012 kl. 15.59 skrev Itamar Heim: > On 11/27/2012 09:56 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: >> >> 27 nov 2012 kl. 15.42 skrev Itamar Heim: >> >>> On 11/27/2012 08:28 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: >>>> Hey all! >>>> >>>> Since recently patching our hosts, I´ve been having trouble running FreeBSD guests with more than one virtual core or socket. I have managed take a screenshot of how it looks like when it panics when booting kernel, right after ACPI: >>>> http://i47.tinypic.com/2u90qrr.png >>>> >>>> I´ve tried this with similar results using 8.2-RELEASE, 8.3-RELEASE, 9.0-RELEASE and 9-STABLE. >>>> >>>> If I edit the guest to have only one virtual core or socket, it boots up without issue. >>>> >>>> Since noticing this, I´ve tried updating the packages one more time, thinking maybe it had already been fixed but no, it remains. These are the package versions I´m using: >>>> # rpm -qa | egrep '(kernel|libvirt|qemu|vdsm|seabios)' | sort -d >>>> ipxe-roms-qemu-20120328-1.gitaac9718.fc17.noarch >>>> kernel-3.6.2-4.fc17.x86_64 >>>> kernel-3.6.3-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>> kernel-3.6.7-4.fc17.x86_64 << This is the one that´s running >>>> libvirt-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>> libvirt-client-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>> libvirt-daemon-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>> libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>> libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>> libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>> libvirt-python-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>> qemu-common-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 >>>> qemu-img-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 >>>> qemu-kvm-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 >>>> qemu-kvm-tools-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 >>>> qemu-system-x86-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64 >>>> seabios-1.7.1-1.fc17.x86_64 >>>> seabios-bin-1.7.1-1.fc17.noarch >>>> vdsm-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64 >>>> vdsm-cli-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch >>>> vdsm-python-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64 >>>> vdsm-xmlrpc-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch >>>> >>>> Do you have any insights as to what the problem might be? >>>> >>>> Best Regards >>>> Karli Sjöberg >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> Users(a)ovirt.org >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>> >>> the first suspect would be qemu-kvm and maybe the bios, can you please downgrade it to the previously >> >> Oh the fun of downgrading...pass:) But it just so happens that we have another ovirt system running, apart from the production system, that may be less patched. I´ll check and see if there´s any difference there. Is there any data you wish me to share, like logs or something while testing? Or just yay/nay? > > if we identify the offending package, and versions, easier to report the regression and ask to fix it So yay/nay it is! Thanks.