The heal status is showing that no pending files need healing (also shown
at GUI).
When checking the bricks on the file system I see that what is different
between the server is the .shard folder of the volume. One server reports
835GB while the other 1.1 TB.
I recall to have changed the shard size at some point from 4 MB to 64MB.
Could this be the cause?
Thanx,
Alex
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On 09/18/2017 10:08 AM, Alex K wrote:
Hi Ravishankar,
I am not referring to the arbiter volume(which is showing 0% usage). I am
referring to the other 2 volumes which are replicas and should have the
exact same data. Checking the status of other bricks in ovirt (bricks used
from iso and export domain) I see that they all report same usage of data
on the data volumes, except the "vms" volume used for storing vms.
Ah, okay. Some of the things that can cause a variation in disk usage:
- Pending self-heals in gluster (check if `gluster volume heal <volname>
info` doesn't show any entries. Also if there is anything under
`.glusterfs/landfill` folder of the bricks).
- XFS speculative preallocation
- Possibly some bug in self-healing of sparse files by gluster (although
we fixed known bugs a long time back in this area).
Regards
Ravi
Thanx,
Alex
On Sep 18, 2017 07:00, "Ravishankar N" <ravishankar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 09/17/2017 08:41 PM, Alex K wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have replica 3 with 1 arbiter.
> When checking the gluster volume bricks they are reported as using
> different space, as per attached. How come they use different space? One
> would expect to use exactly the same space since they are replica.
>
> The 3rd brick (arbiter ) only holds meta data, so it would not consume as
> much space as the other 2 data bricks. So what you are seeing is expected
> behaviour.
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
> Thanx,
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers@ovirt.orghttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>