Re: [Users] win 7 vm creation:

From: "Livnat Peer" <lpeer(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com&gt; Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 12:27:57 PM Subject: Re: [Users] win 7 vm creation: Hi Gianluca, From looking in the logs it looks like you had some DB upgrade issue, or DB clean install issue. "Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: The column name count_threads_as_cores was not found in this ResultSet" Adding Doron to take take a look, and I think Einav also had some db upgrade issue last week...

After fixing you DB issues, can you tell me if you have host in status up, I don't see any network related issue in the logs. Livnat On 01/05/2013 03:07 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > Current network config on host: > > # ip addr list > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > inet 127.0.0.1/8 <http://127.0.0.1/8> scope host lo > inet6 ::1/128 scope host > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 2: em1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state > UP > qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:1e:0b:21:b8:c4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::21e:bff:fe21:b8c4/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 3: em2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state > UP > qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:1e:0b:21:b8:c6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::21e:bff:fe21:b8c6/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 4: em3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master > ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:1c:c4:ab:3a:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 5: em4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state > UP > qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:1c:c4:ab:3a:de brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::21c:c4ff:feab:3ade/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 6: em3.65@em3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc > noqueue > state UP > link/ether 00:1c:c4:ab:3a:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 10.4.4.59/24 <http://10.4.4.59/24> brd 10.4.4.255 scope > global > em3.65 > inet6 fe80::21c:c4ff:feab:3add/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > 11: ;vdsmdummy;: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state > DOWN > link/ether 96:14:65:da:bc:c5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 12: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state > DOWN > link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 13: bond4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state > DOWN > link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 14: bond1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state > DOWN > link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 15: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc > noqueue > state UP > link/ether 00:1c:c4:ab:3a:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 fe80::21c:c4ff:feab:3add/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > # brctl show > bridge namebridge idSTP enabledinterfaces > ;vdsmdummy;8000.000000000000no > ovirtmgmt8000.001cc4ab3addnoem3 > > Do I have perhaps to say/config that ovirtmgmt is tagged in any > way? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users