Re: [ovirt-users] Fwd: RE: FC QLogic question

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11.09.2014 19:20, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: Sorry for getting Off-Topic: Well yeah, I see lots of improvement, also in the node project. But when people ask about what do you recommend for production I really can't call for node (yet). Most deployments tend to need customization specific to the site where the deployment takes place and in the past it was very hard to alter node for your personal needs (that's also not the projects main goal imho). I don't want to discourage anyone from testing node, but I won't recommend it for production, as I wouldn't recommend fedora (and breakage has happened for people using fedora, just search this mailing list). I really appreciate all the work that is done and I see many improvements, but when it comes to giving advice, some developers are a little naive, I can even make a list: someone has a problem in production: "yeah this is fixed in $BETA (or $ALPHA), just try it out" (without even mentioning that it's a beta release!) "you could easily backport the fix yourself, it's just a one liner" "you need to alter config param $X" (not mentioning this param gets overwritten on upgrades) and so on. I know these are all just good intentions, but I think some people seem to think those people asking are all just running test environments, which is plainly wrong, or I don't know what they think, maybe that it's already robust enough. the project has matured so much, you should keep in mind people might use it to run their business/store sensitive data/host very critical machines on top of ovirt. this is great, but this also comes with some kind of responsibility on the side of a developer. At least that's my opinion when I develop stuff (not such huge projects ;) ) I know there are labels on every open source project and in all software licenses like "use at your own risk". But there is some moral responsibility for stuff you do you can't talk away with some legal paper saying your not responsible for what you do (code) or advice you give. Maybe you should just ask yourself sometimes: "would I do myself what I just advocated if I have really sensible data in my environment?" Anyway, keep up the good work! I know it's all good intentions and of course every developer wants his new features getting used. :) Thanks Sven