Re: [ovirt-users] High latency on storage domains and sanlock renewal error

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stefano Bovina <bovy89(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Yes, > this configuration is the one suggested by EMC for EL7. > https://access.redhat.com/solutions/139193 suggest that for alua, the patch checker needs to be different. Anyway, it is very likely that you have storage issues - they need to be resolved first and I believe they have little to do with oVirt at the moment. Y. > > By the way, > "The parameters rr_min_io vs. rr_min_io_rq mean the same thing but are > used for device-mapper-multipath on differing kernel versions." and > rr_min_io_rq default value is 1, rr_min_io default value is 1000, so it > should be fine. > > > 2017-05-08 9:39 GMT+02:00 Yaniv Kaul <ykaul(a)redhat.com&gt;: > >> >> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Stefano Bovina <bovy89(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Sense data are 0x0/0x0/0x0 >> >> >> Interesting - first time I'm seeing 0/0/0. The 1st is usually 0x2 (see >> [1]), and then the rest [2], [3] make sense. >> >> A google search found another user with Clarion with the exact same >> error[4], so I'm leaning toward misconfiguration of multipathing/clarion >> here. >> >> Is your multipathing configuration working well for you? >> Are you sure it's a EL7 configuration? For example, I believe you should >> have rr_min_io_rq and not rr_min_io . >> Y. >> >> [1] http://www.t10.org/lists/2status.htm >> [2] http://www.t10.org/lists/2sensekey.htm >> [3] http://www.t10.org/lists/asc-num.htm >> [4] http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/centos-111/multi >> path-problems-4175544908/ >> > >