[ovirt-users] Re: Creating a static route

Lev, Here you go. From non-working system -bash-4.2# ip rule 0: from all lookup local 32764: from all to 172.21.0.0/16 iif ovirtmgmt lookup 2887058719 32765: from 172.21.0.0/16 lookup 2887058719 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default From working system [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip rule 0: from all lookup local 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com&gt; *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 12:35 PM *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com&gt; *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route Hi Doug, That shouldn't really matter, since ovirtmgmt is just a bridged interface, and unless I'm missing something it shouldn't really affect routing. Can you please also provide the output of "ip rule" from both working and non-working hosts ? Thanks in advance, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:01 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com&gt; wrote: Lev, Here’s the ip route from the server that worked and didn’t work IP Route from server that worked [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip route default via 172.21.0.250 dev eno3 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno3 scope link metric 1002 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno4 scope link metric 1005 172.17.0.0/16 dev eno4 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.53.18 172.21.0.0/16 dev eno3 proto kernel scope link src 172.21.5.34 *172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 dev eno3* 172.26.0.0/16 dev eno1 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.5.34 IP Route from server that didn't work -bash-4.2# ip route default via 172.21.0.250 dev ovirtmgmt 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno4 scope link metric 1004 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovirtmgmt scope link metric 1021 172.17.0.0/16 dev eno4 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.53.15 172.21.0.0/16 dev ovirtmgmt proto kernel scope link src 172.21.5.31 *172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 dev ovirtmgmt* 172.26.0.0/16 dev eno1 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.5.31 We have had our network team look and they don’t know. As I said, the was setup by Commvault. It’s almost like the ovirtmgmt interface will not allow a route add due to the way it’s configured? They, Commvault, are trying different things within their software to get this working, but it’s causing us more problems. I figured I would take a shot and see if someone, who works with the oVirt software, would have any ideas. [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com&gt; *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 11:51 AM *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com&gt; *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route Hi Doug, This is indeed quite weird... It looks like the OS for some reason disregards the static route that you have added. BTW, have you verified that it's indeed was added by running "ip route" following the "ip route add ..." command ? Maybe somebody from the network team has an idea of what may be the cause of this issue... Thanks in advance, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:36 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com&gt; wrote: Lev, I’m showing you the same outputs (ip a, ip route, traceroute, ip route add, and traceroute) from another server in this group that doesn’t use the ovirtmgmt for it’s default interface. [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eno3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 90:1b:0e:db:bc:c0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.21.5.34/16 brd 172.21.255.255 scope global eno3 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::921b:eff:fedb:bcc0/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 90:1b:0e:e8:da:03 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.26.5.34/16 brd 172.26.255.255 scope global eno1 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::921b:eff:fee8:da03/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: eno2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 90:1b:0e:e8:da:04 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 5: eno4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 90:1b:0e:db:bc:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.17.53.18/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global eno4 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::921b:eff:fedb:bcc1/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip route default via 172.21.0.250 dev eno3 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno3 scope link metric 1002 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno4 scope link metric 1005 172.17.0.0/16 dev eno4 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.53.18 172.21.0.0/16 dev eno3 proto kernel scope link src 172.21.5.34 172.26.0.0/16 dev eno1 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.5.34 [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# traceroute 172.22.20.31 traceroute to 172.22.20.31 (172.22.20.31), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 ames-acc1-agg-1.emcins.com (172.21.0.246) 1.081 ms 1.816 ms 1.832 ms 2 192.168.200.30 (192.168.200.30) 0.639 ms 192.168.200.14 (192.168.200.14) 1.063 ms 1.577 ms 3 192.168.200.101 (192.168.200.101) 3.110 ms ames-sw-wanrtr.emcins.com (192.168.200.97) 3.191 ms 3.277 ms 4 192.168.100.26 (192.168.100.26) 4.146 ms 4.273 ms 4.394 ms 5 192.168.100.98 (192.168.100.98) 1.893 ms 2.364 ms 2.397 ms 6 192.168.100.50 (192.168.100.50) 5.707 ms 192.168.100.33 (192.168.100.33) 5.134 ms 192.168.100.50 (192.168.100.50) 4.105 ms 7 pdputopcomm01.emcins.com (172.22.20.31) 1.359 ms 1.374 ms 1.351 ms [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip route add 172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# traceroute 172.22.20.31 traceroute to 172.22.20.31 (172.22.20.31), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 CenteraAmesAN1.emcins.com (172.21.12.61) 6.184 ms 6.475 ms 6.686 ms 2 192.168.90.9 (192.168.90.9) 1.770 ms 1.979 ms 2.189 ms 3 pdputopcomm01.emcins.com (172.22.20.31) 1.405 ms * 1.354 ms [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com&gt; *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 11:07 AM *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com&gt; *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route Hi Doug, In most cases it should not be required, especially as my guess (again it would be easier if you could post the output of the "ip a" and "ip route") is that the eno1 is part of the ovirtmgmt bridge. What is the output of the "traceroute 172.22.20.31" that you get on the host after you have added the static route? Thanks in advance, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:58 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com&gt; wrote: Lev, One other question, since there are multiple enabled interfaces (ovirtmgmt and eno1), do I need to specify an interface for the route add. [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com&gt; *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:50 AM *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com&gt; *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route Hi Doug, What do you mean by "static route is refused"? What is the error message(s) you see? Can you please try to add the route with the following command: ip route add 172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 If that doesn't work, then please provide more details, i.e. what is the exact error message(s) you see, the version of your OS and oVirt, output of "ip a" and "ip route" on your host(s), so that it will be easier to help you. Thanks in advance, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:43 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com&gt; wrote: Lev, Thanks for your response. If I attempt to manually add the route using route add: route add -net 172.22.20.31 netmask 255.255.255.255 gw 172.21.12.61 dev ovirtmgmt This static route is refused and all traffic is routed over the default gateway. But if I use a server that doesn’t use the ovirtmgmt interface and set the same static route, the required data is routed correctly over that static route. [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com&gt; *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:34 AM *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com&gt; *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route Hi Doug, What is the exact problem you are having while attempting to add a static route on the hosts? Thanks in advance, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:23 PM <doug.l.maxfield(a)emcins.com&gt; wrote: Good Morning, New to oVirt. We are using this with a backup solution from Commvault. The issue that we are having is that we need to setup a static route for specific data between 2 remote sites. The ovirtmgmt is configured with the correct IP and gateway for the server. We need to route data over a different gateway so that we don't "max out" the default network connection between the 2 sites. Example below Ovirtmgmt IP - 172.21.5.31 Gateway IP - 172.21.0.250 We need any traffic with a destination of 172.22.20.31(Remote site) to route over this gateway, 172.21.12.61 There are multiple servers in this configuration. Servers that are not using the ovirtmgmt interface for their default, we are able to route the data. The only problem is with attempting to setup a different static route on the ovirtmgmt interfaces. Thanks in advance for any help!!! Doug _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/WGXSLHAP3X5... -- *Lev Veyde* Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP Red Hat Israel <https://www.redhat.com> lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> NOTICE: This message (including any attachments) is intended for a specific individual and may contain information that is either confidential or legally protected. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Thank you. EMC071856 -- *Lev Veyde* Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP Red Hat Israel <https://www.redhat.com> lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> -- *Lev Veyde* Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP Red Hat Israel <https://www.redhat.com> lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> -- *Lev Veyde* Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP Red Hat Israel <https://www.redhat.com> lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> -- *Lev Veyde* Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP Red Hat Israel <https://www.redhat.com> lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted>