Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage?
There's are already enaugh articles on the web about NFS problems related
locking, latency, etc.... Eh stacking a protocol onto another to fix
problem and then maybe one more to glue them together.
Google for the suse PDF " why NFS sucks", I don't agree with the whole
sheet.. NFS got his place,too. But not as production filer for VM.
Cheers,
Juergen, the NFS lover
On Jan 9, 2014 8:10 AM, "Markus Stockhausen" <stockhausen(a)collogia.de>
wrote:
> Von: users-bounces(a)ovirt.org [users-bounces(a)ovirt.org]" im
Auftrag von
"squadra [squadra(a)gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2014 17:15
> An: users(a)ovirt.org
> Betreff: Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage?
>
> better go for iscsi or something else... i whould avoid nfs for vm
hosting
> Freebsd10 delivers kernel iscsitarget now, which works great so far. or
go with omnios to get comstar iscsi, which is a rocksolid solution
>
> Cheers,
>
> Juergen
That is usually a matter of taste and the available environment.
The minimal differences in performance usually only show up
if you drive the storage to its limits. I guess you could help Sven
better if you had some hard facts why to favour ISCSI.
Best regards.
Markus
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.8 KB)