Re: [Users] save to restart libvirtd ?
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050809010202050605030902
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
would that stop any of the running VMs ?
alex
On 04/16/2013 09:47 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 05:12:35PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart
>> libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ?
>>
> Hi,
>
> for libvirt questions, I'd rather use libvirt-users(a)redhat.com, but for
> this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that
> enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are
> being ran.
>
> Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every
> single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of
> your machines.
Indeed. Vdsm should notice that libvirtd has died, and restart itself.
However, it would be safer to stop Vdsm explicitly before you do that
(for example http://gerrit.ovirt.org/8283 )
--------------050809010202050605030902
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font size="-1"><font face="Tahoma">would that stop
any of the
running VMs ?<br>
<br>
alex<br>
</font></font><br>
On 04/16/2013 09:47 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20130416204759.GK5925@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 05:12:35PM +0200, Martin
Kletzander wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart
libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Hi,
for libvirt questions, I'd rather use <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:libvirt-users@redhat.com">libvirt-users@redhat.com</a>,
but for
this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that
enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are
being ran.
Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every
single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of
your machines.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Indeed. Vdsm should notice that libvirtd has died, and restart itself.
However, it would be safer to stop Vdsm explicitly before you do that
(for example <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://gerrit.ovirt.org/8283">http://gerrit.ovirt.org/... )
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------050809010202050605030902--
Attachments:
- attachment.bin (multipart/alternative — 2.9 KB)