Re: [Users] Disk Migration

From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; To: dron(a)redhat.com Cc: "Maurice James" <midnightsteel(a)msn.com&gt;, "Ofer Blaut" <oblaut(a)redhat.com&gt;, users(a)ovirt.org, "Michal Skrivanek" <mskrivan(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:15:24 AM Subject: Re: [Users] Disk Migration ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dafna Ron" <dron(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Maurice James" <midnightsteel(a)msn.com&gt; > Cc: "Ofer Blaut" <oblaut(a)redhat.com&gt;, users(a)ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 7:34:11 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] Disk Migration > > On 02/26/2014 05:24 PM, Maurice James wrote: > > I have a specific interface set up for migrations. Why do disk > > migrations not use the interface that I have set for migrations? Is > > that by design? Shouldnt it use the interfaces that I have set aside > > for migrations? VM migrations work as they should but not disk migrations > > I don't think that you can configure interface for disk migration. > Disk migration is actually copy of information from the original disk to > a new disk created on a new domain + delete of the original disk once > that is done. > it's not actually a migration and so I am not sure you can actually > configure an interface for that. > adding ofer - perhpas he has a solution or it's possible and I am not > aware of it. I guess that *not* using the migration network for storage operation is the expected behavior, to make migration faster and safer.