[ovirt-users] Re: ovirt, postfix and sendmail

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacchella(a)orange.fr&gt; wrote: Indeed Indeed, but there is obviously a trade-off here. If we can solve a bug that affects, say, 30% of the setups, by requiring a package that takes 300KB disk space, and has (hopefully) no security/administrative/etc. implications, I'd say it's worth adding. I am pretty certain that each was added with a good reason. Sometimes you can find the reason in the git commit, or in the linked bug. If you disagree about a specific item, after accepting the general reasoning above, feel free to open a bug. If you disagree with the entire reasoning, it means, practically, that you want more than one ovirt-node, perhaps many more, which will require much more work. Would you volunteer to maintain the various flavors? ovirt-node-gluster-postfix, ovirt-node-ovn-postfix, ovirt-node-gluster-ovn-postfix, ovirt-node-postfix, ovirt-node-sendmail, ... While I do not follow closely maintenance of ovirt-host, I was involved in deciding we do want it, and so far think it was a good decision. Before that, we had partial lists of requirements duplicated over ovirt-host-deploy, ovirt-hosted-engine-setup, ovirt-node (and then ovirt-release, which new ovirt-node uses), and always forgot to update some of them when adding/updating stuff. Current state, of having everything in a single (rather large, admittedly) ovirt-host meta-package is much better. -- Didi