On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Ben Bradley <listsbb(a)virtx.net> wrote:
On 28/09/17 22:27, Ben Bradley wrote:
> On 28/09/17 08:32, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Ben Bradley <listsbb(a)virtx.net
>> <mailto:listsbb@virtx.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All
>>
>> I'm looking to add a new host to my oVirt lab installation.
>> I'm going to share out some LVs from a separate box over iSCSI and
>> will hook the new host up to that.
>> I have 2 NICs on the storage host and 2 NICs on the new Ovirt host
>> to dedicate to the iSCSI traffic.
>> I also have 2 separate switches so I'm looking for redundancy here.
>> Both iSCSI host and oVirt host plugged into both switches.
>>
>> If this was non-iSCSI traffic and without oVirt I would create
>> bonded interfaces in active-backup mode and layer the VLANs on top
>> of that.
>>
>> But for iSCSI traffic without oVirt involved I wouldn't bother with
>> a bond and just use multipath.
>>
>> From scanning the oVirt docs it looks like there is an option to
>> have oVirt configure iSCSI multipathing.
>>
>>
>> Look for iSCSI bonding - that's the feature you are looking for.
>>
>
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> By iSCSI bonding, do you mean the oVirt feature "iSCSI multipathing" as
> mentioned here
https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/admin-guide/chap-
> Storage/ ?
>
> Separate links seems to be the consensus then. Since these are links
> dedicated to iSCSI traffic, not shared. the ovirtmgmt bridge lives on top
> of an active-backup bond on other NICs.
>
> Thanks, Ben
>
And an extra question about oVirt's iSCSI multipathing - should each path
be a separate VLAN+subnet?
I assume it should be separate VLANs for running separate physical fabrics
if desired.
Depends on your network architecture. Doesn't have to be.
Y.
Thanks, Ben
> So what's the best/most-supported option for oVirt?
>> Manually create active-backup bonds so oVirt just sees a single
>> storage link between host and storage?
>> Or leave them as separate interfaces on each side and use oVirt's
>> multipath/bonding?
>>
>> Also I quite like the idea of using IPv6 for the iSCSI VLAN, purely
>> down to the fact I could use link-local addressing and not have to
>> worry about setting up static IPv4 addresses or DHCP. Is IPv6 iSCSI
>> supported by oVirt?
>>
>>
>> No, we do not. There has been some work in the area[1], but I'm not sure
>> it is complete.
>> Y.
>>
>> [1]
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:merged+project:vdsm+bran
>> ch:master+topic:ipv6-iscsi-target-support
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Ben
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> <
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>