@Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste(a)k0ste.ru> :
I recommend to look to OpenStack or some OpenNebula/Proxmox if you wan’t
use Ceph Storage.
I have tested all options but oVirt seems to tick most required boxes.
OpenStack : Too complex for use case
Proxmox : Love Ceph support but very basic clustering support
OpenNebula : Weird VM state machine.
Not sure if you know that rbd-nbd support is going to be implemented to
Cinderlib. I could understand why oVirt wants to support CinderLib and
deprecate Cinder support.
@Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com>
Most probably it will be easier if you stick with full-blown distro.
Yesterday, I was able to bring up a single host single disk Ceph cluster on
oVirt Node NG 4.4.4 after enabling some repositories. Having said that, I
didn't try image based upgrades to host.
I read somewhere that rpms are persisted between host upgrades in Node NG
now.
@Benny Zlotnik
Moreover, it is not possible to use a pure Managed Block Storage
setup
at all, there has to be at least one regular storage domain in a
datacenter
Thanks for pointing out the requirement for Master domain. In theory, will
I be able to satisfy the requirement with another iSCSI or maybe Ceph iSCSI
as master domain?
So each node has
- oVirt Node NG / Centos
- Ceph cluster member
- iSCSI or Ceph iSCSI master domain
How practical is such a setup?
Thanks,
Shantur
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:39 AM Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste(a)k0ste.ru> wrote:
Yep, BZ is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539837
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904669
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905113
Thanks,
k
On 19 Jan 2021, at 11:05, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
perhaps a copy paste error about the bugzilla entries? They are the same
number...