Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote: <snip> > > > - There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec > > requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days? > it does run, but we can't enable it since it's still failing: > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_3.3_install_rpm_sanity_gerrit/label=fed... > once that's fixed, the job will be enabled and run per patch. Yaniv, any idea why we still have file /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen/__init__.py from install of vdsm-python-cpopen-4.12.1-4.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package python-cpopen-1.2.3-2.fc19.x86_64 ? > > > - Keep the docs updated. Our Jenkins slaves have pep8-1.4.6, so we > > should update > > http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers#Installing_required_packages > > accordingly - and more importantly, make that version available. > > > Sandro, who built the python-pep8-1.4.6 that sits on the el6 Jenkins > > slave? Could you make it publicly available? (I can volunteer > > http://danken.fedorapeople.org again) > i tend to agree here with patrick on using non released pep8 packages, that are not available > via rpms, but only via python-pip. > the jenkins slaves were updated via pyhon-pip and not via yum upgrade. Eyal, I do not understand your opinion here... In any case, I've added http://danken.fedorapeople.org/python-pep8-1.4.5-2.el6.noarch.rpm if anyone find this unsigned unsupported hardly tested package useful. Dan.