Re: [Users] Upgrade problem.

On 09/25/2012 12:56 PM, Andres Gonzalez wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Karli Sjöberg <Karli.Sjoberg(a)slu.se > <mailto:Karli.Sjoberg@slu.se>> wrote: > > > 25 sep 2012 kl. 12.08 skrev Itamar Heim: > > On 09/25/2012 12:01 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: >> >>> >>> 25 sep 2012 kl. 10.25 skrev Itamar Heim: >>> >>> On 09/25/2012 07:25 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 25 sep 2012 kl. 05.56 skrev Andres Gonzalez: >>>>> >>>>> UPDATE: I could reinstall oVirt and it's working, the problem >>>>>> now is >>>>>> that I cannot attach the local storage that is where the VMs are. >>>>>> Is there any way that I can add it ? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This may be this kernel-3.5-issue... If you have installed a >>>>> 3.5 kernel, >>>>> downgrade to 3.4 or 3.3 and I´m rather sure your issues will go >>>>> away. >>>>> >>>> >>>> but... >>>> this is centos, not fedora and local storage and not nfs? >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, my bad, sorry. Missed the local storage part. But are you >>> saying >>> that CentOS running kernel 3.5 aren´t having the same issue as >>> Fedora? >>> >> >> no, that would indeed cause the same problem. >> it is just that 3.5 isn't normally a centos kernel (i may have >> missed it being mentioned specifically being used here) >> > > No, you hadn´t missed anything, I was just checking. Thanks. > > >> >>> >>>> Andres - these rpms are maintained in a separate repo, not sure >>>> they >>>> passed testing for upgrade. >>>> if you did a re-install, did you preserve the previous db? >>>> what was the upgrade issue in the log? >>>> to use previous VMs, either change the storage domain to an >>>> export one >>>> and import the VMs back, or create another set of these VMs and >>>> move >>>> over the disks in the storage. >>>> still no "import existing storage domain" feature >>>> >>>> >>>>> /Karli >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Andres Gonzalez >>>>>> <tuchoz(a)gmail.com <mailto:tuchoz@gmail.com> >>>>>> <mailto:tuchoz@gmail.com> >>>>>> <mailto:tuchoz@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>> I upgraded from oVirt 3.1.16 to 3.1.19 under CentOS 6.3 (yum >>>>>> update). The thing is now oVirt is not starting. >>>>>> The web interfaces says: Service Temporarily Unavailable, >>>>>> the VMs >>>>>> don't starts (the box is configured as all-in-one) >>>>>> >>>>>> I have 2 VMs on production. What I can do ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks.- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AGD >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Med Vänliga Hälsningar >>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>>>> ------------------- >>>>> Karli Sjöberg >>>>> Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences >>>>> Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8) >>>>> S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden >>>>> Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66 <tel:%2B46-%280%2918-67%2015%**2066> >>>>> karli.sjoberg(a)slu.se <mailto:karli.sjoberg@slu.se> >>>>> >>>>> <mailto:karli.sjoberg@slu.se> >>>>> <mailto:karli.sjoberg@adm.slu.**se <karli.sjoberg(a)adm.slu.se&gt;&gt; >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>> Users mailing list >>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> >>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org... >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Med Vänliga Hälsningar >>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>> ------------------- >>> Karli Sjöberg >>> Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences >>> Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8) >>> S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden >>> Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66 <tel:%2B46-%280%2918-67%2015%**2066> >>> >>> karli.sjoberg(a)slu.se <mailto:karli.sjoberg@slu.se> >>> <mailto:karli.sjoberg@adm.slu.**se <karli.sjoberg(a)adm.slu.se&gt;&gt; >>> >>> >> >> Hi !! First, thanks all for the replies. > > As I didn't know hoy to convert an storage domain to export, what I did > is to reinstall the "all-in-one", create the 2 VMs and then make a dd > from the "old" image to the new one created. > > Just in case, how can I convert an storage domain to an export ? > hacking its metadata, and it wouldn't have saved you copying the data. (not sure why you dd'd instead of mv'd in your case)