On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 11:41 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:07 PM, René Koch (ovido) wrote:
Two questions:
1) On my all-in-one system with f18 + oVirt stable 3.2.1 I have
ovirt-engine-3.2.1-1.fc18.noarch
ovirt-engine-cli-3.2.0.11-1.fc18.noarch
when I run ovirt-shell I get
>>> connected to oVirt manager 3.2.0.0 <<<
so this banner refers to ovirt-shell itself and not the engine itself,
I presume... correct?
It seems that this banner does reflect the oVirt/RHEV major version.
Connecting to RHEV 3.1 with ovirt-shell (from oVirt 3.2 package) gives
me the following banner:
==========================================
>> connected to oVirt manager 3.1.0.0 <<<
==========================================
oVirt 3.2.1 says "connected to oVirt manager 3.2.0.0"
2) If I have one VM with one snapshot the beginning of the output is:
==========================================
>>> connected to oVirt manager 3.2.0.0 <<<
==========================================
id : f916e1a3-13bc-43e8-8187-65a1ab9163c8
description : Active VM
date : 2013-03-01T00:31:20.898+01:00
snapshot_status: ok
type : active
id : 5a623a18-11eb-455b-9791-680795a23f8e
description : test
date : 2013-03-22T01:08:50.038+01:00
...
Then I create another snapshot and I get:
==========================================
>>> connected to oVirt manager 3.2.0.0 <<<
==========================================
id : c714182a-46e2-4a85-b7db-1b74542b202c
description : Active VM
date : 2013-03-01T00:31:20.898+01:00
snapshot_status: ok
type : active
id : 5a623a18-11eb-455b-9791-680795a23f8e
description : test
date : 2013-03-22T01:08:50.038+01:00
...
id : f916e1a3-13bc-43e8-8187-65a1ab9163c8
description : test2
date : 2013-03-23T11:27:21.931+01:00
snapshot_status : ok
...
If the first "id" value in first 5 lines refers to VM itself, why does
it change between first run with one snapshot
(value f916e1a3-13bc-43e8-8187-65a1ab9163c8)
and the second run
(value c714182a-46e2-4a85-b7db-1b74542b202c)
btw the id of first run matches the id "assigned" to the second
snapshot in second run (test2)?????
Sorry, I've no idea :(
Thanks,
Gianluca