On 02/20/2014 05:24 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
Hi,
is nobody interested in this feature at all?
it would be a huge security gain, while lowering
the bars for having a read only user if this could get shipped with 3.4:
we are very interested, but we want to do this based on the
authentication re-factoring, which in itself, barely made the 3.4 timeline.
Yair - are we "pluggable" yet, that someone could add such a user by
dropping a jar somewhere, or still on going work towards 3.5?
Am 19.02.2014 15:32, schrieb Sven Kieske:> I just looked into my test vm
with the 3.4 beta
> and I can't see such an user there.
>
> I created an RFE at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067036
>
>
> I really hope this can get included in 3.4 (I know it's late)
> as it should be a very very minor change at engine-setup.
>
> Thanks
>
> Am 19.02.2014 14:55, schrieb Sven Kieske:
>> Hi,
>>
>> reiterating on this somewhat old mail:
>>
>> Is there a read only user integrated in 3.4?
>>
>> Because it's a huge overhead to install somewhere
>> e.g. a freeipa server just to get read only access.
>>
>> Am 21.11.2013 09:52, schrieb Sander Grendelman:
>>> Hi Doron,
>>>
>>> The user I've defined in [1] works for me.
>>> A built-in login-/read-only role would be nice,
>>> but it's quite easy to define a custom role so
>>> more of a nice-to-have instead of a must-have.
>>>
>>> Thanks for asking!
>>>
>>> Sander.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Doron Fediuck <dfediuck(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>> Hi Sander,
>>>> We're closing the ovirt 3.4 scope, and wondering if you're
handling
>>>> Zabbix based on [1].
>>>> If so please let me know and I'll update the 3.4 features list.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Doron
>>>>
>>>> [1]
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-November/017946.html
>>
>