Re: [Users] why ovirt does not support NAT network

Why not Bridged/routed NAT Setup? Iam currently heavy using those setups. All VMs have an internal nic let say physical host1 - 10.10.10.x physical host2 - 10-10.11.x psysical host vpn - 10.10.1.x so basically every psysical host has at least one physical NIC, one virtual VPN nic, one virtual bridge. all those are internal routed (i use openvpn to connect host 1 and 2) so every VM can communicate to each others vm every psysical host hast also NAT to forward one or more IP/ports to each VM also the psysical host can work as a transparent firewall and i dont need a vpn nic on every vm. so what i would love to have is at least ability to use the vpn network interfaces instead of real one and at least beeing able to say that bridge/nat vonfig is done manually , which isnot ideal but better than not beeing able to use that setup at all why is it needed. well either you rent a server, OR you have several server in an external data center but they dont reside to each other AND/ OR you have several server on different data center OR you have a tight security policy no traffic without VPN (you know google should have used that a loong time ago to prevent snow lol) VLANs are nice but limited to psysical access and are also local