On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:48 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Il giorno dom 5 apr 2020 alle ore 19:32 Strahil Nikolov <
hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hey Sandro,
>
> Can you clarify which CPUs will not be supported in 4.4 ?
>
I can give the list of supported CPU according to ovirt-engine code:
select fn_db_add_config_value('ServerCPUList',
'1:Intel Nehalem Family:vmx,nx,model_Nehalem:Nehalem:x86_64; '
|| '2:Secure Intel Nehalem
Family:vmx,spec_ctrl,ssbd,md_clear,model_Nehalem:Nehalem,+spec-ctrl,+ssbd,+md-clear:x86_64;
'
|| '3:Intel Westmere Family:aes,vmx,nx,model_Westmere:Westmere:x86_64; '
|| '4:Secure Intel Westmere
Family:aes,vmx,spec_ctrl,ssbd,md_clear,model_Westmere:Westmere,+pcid,+spec-ctrl,+ssbd,+md-clear:x86_64;
'
|| '5:Intel SandyBridge
Family:vmx,nx,model_SandyBridge:SandyBridge:x86_64; '
|| '6:Secure Intel SandyBridge
Family:vmx,spec_ctrl,ssbd,md_clear,model_SandyBridge:SandyBridge,+pcid,+spec-ctrl,+ssbd,+md-clear:x86_64;
'
|| '7:Intel IvyBridge Family:vmx,nx,model_IvyBridge:IvyBridge:x86_64; '
|| '8:Secure Intel IvyBridge
Family:vmx,spec_ctrl,ssbd,md_clear,model_IvyBridge:IvyBridge,+pcid,+spec-ctrl,+ssbd,+md-clear:x86_64;
'
|| '9:Intel Haswell Family:vmx,nx,model_Haswell:Haswell:x86_64; '
|| '10:Secure Intel Haswell
Family:vmx,spec_ctrl,ssbd,md_clear,model_Haswell:Haswell,+spec-ctrl,+ssbd,+md-clear:x86_64;
'
|| '11:Intel Broadwell Family:vmx,nx,model_Broadwell:Broadwell:x86_64; '
|| '12:Secure Intel Broadwell
Family:vmx,spec_ctrl,ssbd,md_clear,model_Broadwell:Broadwell,+spec-ctrl,+ssbd,+md-clear:x86_64;
'
|| '13:Intel Skylake Client
Family:vmx,nx,model_Skylake-Client:Skylake-Client:x86_64; '
|| '14:Secure Intel Skylake Client
Family:vmx,spec_ctrl,ssbd,md_clear,model_Skylake-Client:Skylake-Client,+spec-ctrl,+ssbd,+md-clear:x86_64;
'
|| '15:Intel Skylake Server
Family:vmx,nx,model_Skylake-Server:Skylake-Server:x86_64; '
|| '16:Secure Intel Skylake Server
Family:vmx,spec_ctrl,ssbd,md_clear,model_Skylake-Server:Skylake-Server,+spec-ctrl,+ssbd,+md-clear:x86_64;
'
|| '17:Intel Cascadelake Server
Family:vmx,model_Cascadelake-Server:Cascadelake-Server,-hle,-rtm,+arch-capabilities:x86_64;
'
|| '18:Secure Intel Cascadelake Server
Family:vmx,md-clear,mds-no,model_Cascadelake-Server:Cascadelake-Server,+md-clear,+mds-no,-hle,-rtm,+tsx-ctrl,+arch-capabilities:x86_64;
'
|| '1:AMD Opteron G4:svm,nx,model_Opteron_G4:Opteron_G4:x86_64; '
|| '2:AMD Opteron G5:svm,nx,model_Opteron_G5:Opteron_G5:x86_64; '
|| '3:AMD EPYC:svm,nx,model_EPYC:EPYC:x86_64; '
|| '4:Secure AMD
EPYC:svm,nx,ibpb,ssbd,model_EPYC:EPYC,+ibpb,+virt-ssbd:x86_64; '
|| '1:IBM POWER8:powernv,model_POWER8:POWER8:ppc64; '
|| '2:IBM POWER9:powernv,model_POWER9:POWER9:ppc64; '
|| '1:IBM z114, z196:sie,model_z196-base:z196-base:s390x; '
|| '2:IBM zBC12, zEC12:sie,model_zEC12-base:zEC12-base:s390x; '
|| '3:IBM z13s, z13:sie,model_z13-base:z13-base:s390x; '
|| '4:IBM z14:sie,model_z14-base:z14-base:s390x;',
'4.4');
> Also, does oVirt 4.4 support teaming or it is still staying with bonding.
> Network Manager was mentioned, but it's not very clear.
>
+Dominik Holler <dholler(a)redhat.com> can you please reply to this?
oVirt stays with bonding.
Reasons why oVirt should support teaming are gathered in
*Bug 1351510* <
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351510> - [RFE]
Support using Team devices instead of bond devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351510
What is the version of gluster bundled with 4.4 ?
>
Latest Gluster 7 shipped by CentOS Storage SIG, right now it is 7.4 (
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/7.4/)
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <
https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
<
https://www.redhat.com/>*
<
https://www.redhat.com/en/summit?sc_cid=7013a000002D2QxAAK>*
*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
answer this email out of your office hours.
<
https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1199578>*