From: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
To: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 1:17:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] ovirt test day: HA VM Reservation feature test summary
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 1:07:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] ovirt test day: HA VM Reservation feature test summary
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 5:54:22 PM
> > Subject: [Users] ovirt test day: HA VM Reservation feature test summary
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In the latest ovirt-test-day i've tested the HA VM resource reservation
> > feature [1] according to the basic scenarios as described on [2].
> >
> > The new feature notifies the admin via an event log about his cluster
> > inability to preserve resources for HA VMs. I've reported 2 bugs based
> > on the behavior: The cluster check doesn't consider the state of the
> > cluster's hosts when it calculates the resources [3] and a minor issue
> > of the audit log translation into a message [4].
> >
> > [1]
http://www.ovirt.org/Features/HA_VM_reservation
> > [2]
http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4_TestDay#SLA
> > [3] Bug 1057579 - HA Vm reservation check ignores host status
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057579
> > [4] Bug 1057584 - HA Vm reservation event log is not well resolved
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057584
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Moti
>
> Thanks, Moti.
> Good catches. When looking at the code I also noticed 'none' policy does
> not
> use
> the ha reservations weight module. Were you using the default policy or
> something
> else?
>
I used the the default ('None') policy in my testing.