Re: [ovirt-users] [ANN] oVirt 4.2.0 First Beta Release is now available for testing
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Robert Story <rstory(a)isi.edu> wrote:
On Tue 2017-10-31 19:57:32+0200 Oved wrote:
> As mentioned earlier, this is one motivation but not the only one.
> You see right click less and less in web applications, as it isn't
> considered a good user experience. This is also the patternfly
> guideline (patternfly is a framework we heavily use throughout the
> application).
Their user guideline is probably based on UI for the masses.
Actually, PatternFly is focused on enterprise applications.
http://www.patternfly.org/community/
"PatternFly is a community of designers and developers collaborating to
build a UI framework for enterprise web applications"
It is based on Bootstrap, and Bootstrap preaches mobile-friendly and
mobile-first. But agreed with the previous point that we should respect the
non-mobile users since that's how the majority of people currently use
oVirt.
I'd argue
that oVirt, particularly the admin portal, is for a much more
technical audience. I think right-click should stay for admin portal.
What are people's opinions on an "actions" button on the far right of the
tables?
See #6 here:
http://www.patternfly.org/pattern-library/content-views/table-view/#/design
Would that be an adequate substitute for right-clicking?
Users are more likely to be less technical. I'd care much less if
everything in the user portal had its own button or was in a menu list.
--
Robert Story <http://www.isi.edu/~rstory>
USC Information Sciences Institute <http://www.isi.edu/>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
GREG SHEREMETA
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER - TEAM LEAD - RHV UX
Red Hat NA
<https://www.redhat.com/>
gshereme(a)redhat.com IRC: gshereme
<https://red.ht/sig>
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 4.5 KB)