On 28/09/17 22:27, Ben Bradley wrote:
On 28/09/17 08:32, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Ben Bradley <listsbb(a)virtx.net
> <mailto:listsbb@virtx.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> I'm looking to add a new host to my oVirt lab installation.
> I'm going to share out some LVs from a separate box over iSCSI and
> will hook the new host up to that.
> I have 2 NICs on the storage host and 2 NICs on the new Ovirt host
> to dedicate to the iSCSI traffic.
> I also have 2 separate switches so I'm looking for redundancy here.
> Both iSCSI host and oVirt host plugged into both switches.
>
> If this was non-iSCSI traffic and without oVirt I would create
> bonded interfaces in active-backup mode and layer the VLANs on top
> of that.
>
> But for iSCSI traffic without oVirt involved I wouldn't bother with
> a bond and just use multipath.
>
> From scanning the oVirt docs it looks like there is an option to
> have oVirt configure iSCSI multipathing.
>
>
> Look for iSCSI bonding - that's the feature you are looking for.
Thanks for the replies.
By iSCSI bonding, do you mean the oVirt feature "iSCSI multipathing" as
mentioned here
https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/admin-guide/chap-Storage/ ?
Separate links seems to be the consensus then. Since these are links
dedicated to iSCSI traffic, not shared. the ovirtmgmt bridge lives on
top of an active-backup bond on other NICs.
Thanks, Ben
And an extra question about oVirt's iSCSI multipathing - should each
path be a separate VLAN+subnet?
I assume it should be separate VLANs for running separate physical
fabrics if desired.
Thanks, Ben
> So what's the best/most-supported option for oVirt?
> Manually create active-backup bonds so oVirt just sees a single
> storage link between host and storage?
> Or leave them as separate interfaces on each side and use oVirt's
> multipath/bonding?
>
> Also I quite like the idea of using IPv6 for the iSCSI VLAN, purely
> down to the fact I could use link-local addressing and not have to
> worry about setting up static IPv4 addresses or DHCP. Is IPv6 iSCSI
> supported by oVirt?
>
>
> No, we do not. There has been some work in the area[1], but I'm not
> sure it is complete.
> Y.
>
> [1]
>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:merged+project:vdsm+branch:master+top...
>
>
>
> Thanks, Ben
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> <
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users