On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:35 AM Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:27 AM <jan.kleefeld(a)jan-home.de>
wrote:
>
> I have a clean installed CentOS 8.2 2004 on my server. The self hosted
engine deploy (ovirt-4.4) aborts with the following message:
>
> [ ERROR ] fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed": false,
"msg": "The
host has been set in non_operational status, deployment errors: code 505:
Host red.colors.ovirt.local installation failed. Failed to configure
management network on the host., code 1120: Failed to configure management
network on host red.colors.ovirt.local due to setup networks failure., code
9000: Failed to verify Power Management configuration for Host
red.colors.ovirt.local., code 10802: VDSM red.colors.ovirt.local command
HostSetupNetworksVDS failed: Internal JSON-RPC error:
> {'reason': '
> desired
> =======
> ---
> dns-resolver:
> search: []
> server:
> - 192.168.2.150
> - fe80::1%eno1
>
> current
> =======
> ---
> dns-resolver:
> search: []
> server:
> - 192.168.2.150
>
> difference
> ==========
> --- desired
> +++ current
> @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@
> search: []
> server:
> - 192.168.2.150
> - - fe80::1%eno1
>
> '}, fix accordingly and re-deploy."}
>
> ~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> # Generated by NetworkManager
> search colors.ovirt.local
> nameserver 192.168.2.150
> nameserver fe80::1%eno1
>
> I am confused, because the probalby missing line is present. Is there
maybe another config file, where this last line could be missing?
> Maybe I can force somehow the installer, to reload the resolv conf, so
it can fetch ne new line?
Can you please check/share other relevant logs (and perhaps other
parts of this one)? Perhaps upload somewhere and share a link, or open
a bug in bugzilla and attach there.
Adding Dominik.
Perhaps we fail to parse the line 'nameserver fe80::1%eno1'?
Yes, IPv6 link local nameserver might not work for static IP addresses, but
might work for dynamic.
Also mixing IPv4 and IPv6 nameservers might confuse lower layers.
Can you share at least the line containing
"call setupNetworks with "
and
"desired state"
of supervdsm.log?
Thanks and best regards,
--
Didi