Re: [Users] API read-only access / roles
On 03/26/2014 06:39 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
Am 26.03.2014 11:21, schrieb Itamar Heim:
> On 03/26/2014 06:16 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as we now have setup ldap, now the question which
>> never got answered in the first place:
>>
>> 1.
>> which rights do I need for read only access?
>>
>> as stated in BZ just login rights won't suffice.
>
> an admin role with login? why not?
> i thought we even pre-created such a default read only role by now:
> Bug 1038222 - [RFE] Read Only Admin role in AP
>
> (and you can create one yourself in 3.3 as well iirc)
>
What would happen if I create this user myself
and I want to upgrade to 3.4 somewhere in time?
My guess would be the upgrade would fail if this
user gets added automatically, because it is already
there?
its not a user. its a system defined role.
you can create a user defined role (with a different name)
you should do this via the GUI in 3.3, not via the db (then the uuid
will be different as well, and no upgrade issues)